The use of the Community Earth System Model in human dimensions climate research and applications

被引:0
|
作者
Laidlaw, Emily K. [1 ,2 ]
O'Neill, Brian C. [1 ,3 ]
Harp, Ryan D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[2] Laidlaw Sci LLC, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Univ Denver, Josef Korbel Sch Int Studies, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CESM; earth system models; human dimensions; IMPACTS; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.582
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Earth system models (ESMs) are the primary tool used to understand and project changes to the climate system. ESM projections underpin analyses of human dimensions of the climate issue, yet little is known about how ESMs are used in human dimensions research. Such foundational information is necessary for future critical assessments of ESMs. We review applications of a leading ESM, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Earth System Model (CESM), to human dimensions topics since 2004. We find that this research has grown substantially over this period, twice as fast as CESM research overall. Although many studies have primarily addressed long-term impacts on physical systems with societal relevance, applications to managed, societal, and ecological systems have grown quickly and now make up more than half of CESM human dimensions work. CESM applications focused nearly equally on global and regional analyses, most often using multimodel ensembles, although the use of single simulations remains prevalent. Downscaling and bias correction of output was infrequent and most common for regional studies. U.S.-based, university-affiliated authors primarily drove human dimensions work using CESM, with only 12% of authors based at NCAR. Our findings identify important questions that warrant further investigation, such as reasons for the infrequent use of downscaling and bias correction techniques; motivations to continue to use older model versions after newer model versions have been released; and model development needs for improved human dimensions applications. Additionally, our synthesis provides a baseline and framework that enables continued tracking of CESM and other ESMs. This article is categorized under: Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Evaluating Future Impacts of Climate Change
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tropical climate variability in the Community Earth System Model: Data Assimilation Research Testbed
    Eliashiv, Jonathan
    Subramanian, Aneesh C.
    Miller, Arthur J.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2020, 54 (1-2) : 793 - 806
  • [2] Tropical climate variability in the Community Earth System Model: Data Assimilation Research Testbed
    Jonathan Eliashiv
    Aneesh C. Subramanian
    Arthur J. Miller
    Climate Dynamics, 2020, 54 : 793 - 806
  • [3] Regional Climate Simulations With the Community Earth System Model
    Gettelman, A.
    Callaghan, P.
    Larson, V. E.
    Zarzycki, C. M.
    Bacmeister, J. T.
    Lauritzen, P. H.
    Bogenschutz, P. A.
    Neale, R. B.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2018, 10 (06): : 1245 - 1265
  • [4] Spatial Decomposition of Climate Feedbacks in the Community Earth System Model
    Gettelman, A.
    Kay, J. E.
    Fasullo, J. T.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (11) : 3544 - 3561
  • [5] The Community Earth System Model A Framework for Collaborative Research
    Hurrell, James W.
    Holland, M. M.
    Gent, P. R.
    Ghan, S.
    Kay, Jennifer E.
    Kushner, P. J.
    Lamarque, J. -F.
    Large, W. G.
    Lawrence, D.
    Lindsay, K.
    Lipscomb, W. H.
    Long, M. C.
    Mahowald, N.
    Marsh, D. R.
    Neale, R. B.
    Rasch, P.
    Vavrus, S.
    Vertenstein, M.
    Bader, D.
    Collins, W. D.
    Hack, J. J.
    Kiehl, J.
    Marshall, S.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 94 (09) : 1339 - 1360
  • [6] A Drift-Free Decadal Climate Prediction System for the Community Earth System Model
    Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu
    Timmermann, Axel
    Widlansky, Matthew J.
    Zhang, Shaoqing
    Balmaseda, Magdalena A.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2019, 32 (18) : 5967 - 5995
  • [7] Broaden research on the human dimensions of climate change
    Noel Castree
    Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 : 731 - 731
  • [8] Broaden research on the human dimensions of climate change
    Castree, Noel
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (08) : 731 - 731
  • [9] Bridging the gap: a new module for human water use in the Community Earth System Model version 2.2.1
    Taranu, Sabin I.
    Lawrence, David M.
    Wada, Yoshihide
    Tang, Ting
    Kluzek, Erik
    Rabin, Sam
    Yao, Yi
    De Hertog, Steven J.
    Vanderkelen, Inne
    Thiery, Wim
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 17 (20) : 7365 - 7399
  • [10] The Community Climate System Model
    Blackmon, M
    Boville, B
    Bryan, F
    Dickinson, R
    Gent, P
    Kiehl, J
    Moritz, R
    Randall, D
    Shukla, J
    Solomon, S
    Bonan, G
    Doney, S
    Fung, I
    Hack, J
    Hunke, E
    Hurrell, J
    Kutzbach, J
    Meehl, J
    Otto-Bliesner, B
    Saravanan, R
    Schneider, EK
    Sloan, L
    Spall, M
    Taylor, K
    Tribbia, J
    Washington, W
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 82 (11) : 2357 - 2376