Comparison of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score method for predicting the outcomes of intensive care unit trauma patients

被引:51
|
作者
Hwang, Seong Youn [1 ]
Lee, Jun Ho [1 ]
Lee, Young Hwan [1 ]
Hong, Chong Kun [1 ]
Sung, Ae Jin [1 ]
Choi, Young Cheol [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Changwon Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Chang Won 630522, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Changwon Hosp, Dept Surg, Chang Won 630522, South Korea
来源
关键词
INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; TRISS METHOD; MORTALITY; DISEASE; SEPSIS; ICISS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.022
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method to predict group mortality for intensive care unit (ICU) trauma patients. Methods: The medical records of 706 consecutive major trauma patients admitted to the ICU of Samsung Changwon Hospital from May 2006 to April 2010 were retrospectively examined. The SOFA and the APACHEII scores were calculated based on data from the first 24 hours of ICU admission, and the TRISS was calculated using initial laboratory data from the emergency department and operative data. The probability of death was calculated for each patient based on the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and TRISS equations. The ability to predict group mortality for the SOFA score, APACHE II score, and TRISS method was assessed by using 2-by-2 decision matrices and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calibration analysis. Results: In 2-by-2 decision matrices with a decision criterion of 0.5, the sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies were 74.1%, 97.1%, and 92.4%, respectively, for the SOFA score; 58.5%, 99.6%, and 91.1%, respectively, for the APACHE II scoring system; and 52.4%, 94.8%, and 86.0%, respectively, for the TRISS method. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the areas under the curve for the SOFA score, APACHE II scoring system, and TRISS method were 0.953, 0.950, and 0.922, respectively. Conclusion: The results from the present study showed that the SOFA score was not different from APACHE II scoring system and TRISS in predicting the outcomes for ICU trauma patients. However, the method for calculating SOFA scores is easier and simpler than APACHE II and TRISS. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 753
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score with organ failure scores to predict hospital mortality
    Ho, K. M.
    Lee, K. Y.
    Williams, T.
    Finn, J.
    Knuiman, M.
    Webb, S. A. R.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 62 (05) : 466 - 473
  • [42] Comparison of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) for early prediction of septic shock in diabetic patients in Emergency Departments
    Liengswangwong, Wijittra
    Siriwannabhorn, Ranchana
    Leela-Amornsin, Sittichok
    Yuksen, Chaiyaporn
    Sanguanwit, Pitsucha
    Duangsri, Chonthicha
    Kusonkhum, Nusara
    Saelim, Parnthap
    BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [43] APPLICATION OF THE "SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT (SOFA) SCORE" IN PREDICTING OUTCOME IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME
    Jaiswal, Suresh
    Shrestha, Sachin
    Bhatta, Puspa
    Zulfiqar, Usman
    Pradhan, Amita
    Berhane, Zekarias
    Mirza, Imran
    Rather, Manzoor
    Eiser, Arnold
    Matchett, Stephen
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (12) : A297 - A297
  • [44] Performance of the score systems Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III at an interdisciplinary intensive care unit, after customization
    Markgraf, R
    Deutschinoff, G
    Pientka, L
    Scholten, T
    Lorenz, C
    CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 5 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [45] Performance of the score systems Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III at an interdisciplinary intensive care unit, after customization
    Rainer Markgraf
    Gerd Deutschinoff
    Ludger Pientka
    Theo Scholten
    Cristoph Lorenz
    Critical Care, 5
  • [46] Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score for the assessment of mortality prediction in the intensive care unit: a single-centre study from Iran
    Bahtouee, Mehrzad
    Eghbali, Seyed S.
    Maleki, Nasrollah
    Rastgou, Vahid
    Motamed, Niloufar
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 24 (06) : 375 - 380
  • [47] Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index, and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis Score in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis
    Chatterjee, Rudrarpan
    Parab, Nitesh
    Sajjan, Basavaraj
    Nagar, Vidya S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 24 (02) : 99 - 103
  • [48] Prognostic value of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and organ system failure in patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis
    Wang, IK
    Wang, ST
    Chang, HY
    Lin, CL
    Kuo, HL
    Chen, TC
    Lee, CH
    Chuang, FR
    RENAL FAILURE, 2005, 27 (06) : 663 - 669
  • [49] Evaluation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III in predicting the prognosis of patients admitted to Emergency Department, in need of intensive care unit
    Hatamabadi, Hamid Reza
    Mazandarani, Parvin Darbandsar
    Abdalvand, Ali
    Dolatabadi, Ali Arhami
    Amini, Afshin
    Kariman, Hamid
    Derakhshanfar, Hojjat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 30 (07): : 1141 - 1145
  • [50] Evaluation of neuro-intensive care unit performance in China: predicting outcomes of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II or Glasgow Coma Scale
    Zhao Xiao-xia
    Su Ying-ying
    Wang Miao
    Zhang Yan
    Ye Hong
    Feng Huan-huan
    Zhang Yun-zhou
    Gao Dai-quan
    Chen Wei-bi
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (06) : 1132 - 1137