Biotechnological Production Process and Life Cycle Assessment of Graphene

被引:11
|
作者
Khanam, P. Noorunnisa [1 ]
Popelka, Anton [1 ]
Alejji, Maryam [1 ]
AlMaadeed, M. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Univ, Ctr Adv Mat, Doha 2713, Qatar
[2] Qatar Univ, Mat Sci & Technol Program, Doha 2713, Qatar
关键词
OXIDE;
D O I
10.1155/2017/5671584
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to compare the graphene produced using a biotechnological method (Escherichia coli) with the graphene produced by Hummers' method (a chemical method) and to study the effect on the energy consumption and environment. The results indicated that the chemical reduction process has higher energy consumption, approximately 1642 Wh, than the energy consumption of the biotechnological reduction process, which is 5 Wh. The potential of global warming (GWP 100) improved by 71% using the biotechnological route for the production of graphene. Abiotic depletion, the photochemical ozone creation potential, and marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential were improved when the biological route was employed, compared with the chemical route. The eutrophication potential, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and ozone depletion layer changed very little since the main variables involved in the production of graphene oxide and waste management are the same. The biotechnological method can be considered a green technique for the production of graphene, especially given the reduction in the negative effects on global warming, abiotic depletion, the photochemical ozone creation potential, and the marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle analysis of an hemicelluloses production process
    Pontalier, Pierre-Yves
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 247
  • [32] An integrated analytic hierarchy process and life cycle assessment model for nanocrystalline cellulose production
    Khai Chyi Teh
    Tan, Raymond R.
    Aviso, Kathleen B.
    Promentilla, Michael Angelo B.
    Tan, Jully
    FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING, 2019, 118 : 13 - 31
  • [33] Environmental impact of Brazilian broiler production process: Evaluation using life cycle assessment
    da Silva Lima, Nilsa Duarte
    Naas, Irenilza de Alencar
    Garcia, Rodrigo Garofallo
    de Moura, Daniella Jorge
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 237
  • [34] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ceramic sanitaryware: focus on the production process and analysis of scenario
    Maria Pia Desole
    Lorenzo Fedele
    Annamaria Gisario
    Massimiliano Barletta
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 21 : 1649 - 1670
  • [35] Exergetic life cycle assessment of cement production process with waste heat power generation
    Sui, Xiuwen
    Zhang, Yun
    Shao, Shuai
    Zhang, Shushen
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 88 : 684 - 692
  • [36] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF SECONDARY EXTRUDED ALUMINUM PRODUCTION PROCESS IN INDUSTRIAL CITY OF ARAK
    Zare, R.
    Nouri, J.
    Abdoli, M. A.
    Atabi, F.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 14 (02): : 125 - 135
  • [37] The Primary and Secondary Production of Germanium: A Life-Cycle Assessment of Different Process Alternatives
    Robertz, Benedicte
    Verhelle, Jensen
    Schurmans, Maarten
    JOM, 2015, 67 (02) : 412 - 424
  • [38] Perovskite Photovoltaic Modules: Life Cycle Assessment of Pre-industrial Production Process
    Alberola-Borras, Jaume-Adria
    Baker, Jenny A.
    De Rossi, Francesca
    Vidal, Rosario
    Beynon, David
    Hooper, Katherine E. A.
    Watson, Trystan M.
    Mora-Sero, Ivan
    ISCIENCE, 2018, 9 : 542 - +
  • [39] Life cycle assessment for bioethanol production from whole plant cassava by integrated process
    Lyu, Huisheng
    Zhang, Jia
    Zhai, Ziwei
    Feng, Yongxin
    Geng, Zhongfeng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 269
  • [40] Combinatorial Life Cycle Assessment to Inform Process Design of Industrial Production of Algal Biodiesel
    Brentner, Laura B.
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    Zimmerman, Julie B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (16) : 7060 - 7067