Assaying the importance of system complexity for the systems engineering community

被引:8
|
作者
Potts, Matthew W. [1 ]
Sartor, Pia A. [1 ]
Johnson, Angus [2 ]
Bullock, Seth [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Aerosp Dept, Bristol BS8 1TB, Avon, England
[2] Thales Res, Technol & Innovat, Reading, Berks, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Comp Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
complexity science; defense & security; government; system architecture; STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1002/sys.21550
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
How should organizations approach the evaluation of system complexity at the early stages of system design in order to inform decision making? Since system complexity can be understood and approached in several different ways, such evaluation is challenging. In this study, we define the term "system complexity factors" to refer to a range of different aspects of system complexity that may contribute differentially to systems engineering outcomes. Views on the absolute and relative importance of these factors for early-life cycle system evaluation are collected and analyzed using a qualitative questionnaire of International Council on Systems Engineers (INCOSE) members (n= 55). We identified and described the following trends in the data: there is little between-participant agreement on the relative importance of system complexity factors, even for participants with a shared background and role; participants tend to be internally consistent in their ratings of the relative importance of system complexity factors. Given the lack of alignment on the relative importance of system complexity factors, we argue that successful evaluation of system complexity can be better ensured by explicit determination and discussion of the (possibly implicit) perspective(s) on system complexity that are being taken.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 596
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SCALING OF BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE - A SYSTEMS-APPROACH TO COMMUNITY COMPLEXITY
    MAURER, BA
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1987, 127 (01) : 97 - 110
  • [32] Complexity, Systems Thinking and an Integrated Systems Engineering and Project Management Model
    Jonkers, Raymond Klaas
    Shahroudi, Kamran Eftekhari
    INCOSE International Symposium, 2020, 30 (01) : 546 - 560
  • [33] Understanding Complexity: The Use of Simulation Games for Engineering Systems
    Bekebrede, Geertje
    Lo, Julia
    Lukosch, Heide
    SIMULATION & GAMING, 2015, 46 (05) : 447 - 454
  • [34] Managing the complexity of plasma physics in control systems engineering
    Beernaert, T. F.
    de Baar, M. R.
    Etman, L. F. P.
    Classen, I. G. J.
    de Bock, M.
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2024, 203
  • [35] Complexity in a Systems Engineering Organization: An Empirical Case Study
    Gilbert, Dawn
    Yearworth, Mike
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2016, 19 (05) : 422 - 435
  • [36] 6.2.1 Complexity Types: From Science to Systems Engineering
    Sheard, Sarah A.
    Mostashari, Ali
    INCOSE International Symposium, 2011, 21 (01) : 673 - 682
  • [37] The complexity of safety: Embracing systems engineering in radiation oncology
    Wong, Lawrence M.
    Pawlicki, Todd
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 26 (03):
  • [38] Engineering in vitro systems to understand complexity of cancer microenvironment
    Matsunaga, Yukiko
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2023, 114 : 1513 - 1513
  • [39] Editorial: Complexity of systems evolution: Requirements engineering perspective
    Jarke, Matthias
    Lyytinen, Kalle
    ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2014, 5 (03)
  • [40] Hominin nomenclature and the importance of information systems for managing complexity in paleoanthropology
    Reed, Denne N.
    Raney, Emily
    Johnson, Jyhreh
    Jackson, Harper
    Virabalin, Nida
    Mbonu, Nina
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2023, 175