Hospitalization Costs for Radical Prostatectomy Attributable to Robotic Surgery

被引:41
|
作者
Kim, Simon P. [1 ]
Shah, Nilay D. [2 ]
Karnes, R. Jeffrey [1 ]
Weight, Christopher J. [3 ]
Shippee, Nathan D. [4 ]
Han, Leona C. [2 ]
Boorjian, Stephen A. [1 ]
Smaldone, Marc C. [5 ]
Frank, Igor [1 ]
Gettman, Matthew T. [1 ]
Tollefson, Matthew K. [1 ]
Thompson, R. Houston [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
Comparative effectiveness; Costs; Outcomes; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; HEALTH-CARE COSTS; CANCER; TECHNOLOGY; ECONOMICS; ADOPTION; OUTCOMES; SHARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: With health technology innovation responsible for higher health care costs, it is essential to have accurate estimates regarding the differential costs between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Objective: To describe the total hospitalization costs attributable to robotic and open surgery for radical prostatectomy (RP). Design, setting, and participants: Using a population-based cohort by merging the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the American Hospital Association (AHA) survey from 2006 to 2008, we identified 29 837 prostate cancer patients who underwent RP. Interventions: ORP and RARP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was total hospitalization costs adjusted to year 2008 US dollars. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with total hospitalization costs and to estimate costs of ORP and RARP adjusted for case mix and hospital teaching status, location, and annual case volume. Results and limitations: Overall, 20 424 (68.5%) patients were surgically treated with RARP, and 9413 (31.5%) patients underwent ORP. Compared to ORP, patients undergoing RARP had shorter median length of stay (1 d vs 2 d; p < 0.001) and were less likely to experience any postoperative complications (8.2% vs 11.3%; p < 0.001). However, patients undergoing RARP had higher median hospitalization costs ($10 409 vs $ 8862; p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and hospital features, RARP was associated with higher total hospitalization costs compared to ORP ($11 932 vs $9390; p < 0.001). Our results are limited by a study design using retrospective population-based data. Conclusions: Despite RARP having lower complications and shorter length of stay than ORP, total hospitalization costs are higher for patients treated with RARP compared with those treated with ORP. (c) 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 16
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robotic prostatectomy
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 : A125 - A125
  • [32] ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERY REDUCES RECTAL INJURY RATES IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PATIENTS
    Tamaddon, Kirk
    Aparicio, Alfredo
    Parekh, Ashish
    Pathak, Apurba
    Bassett, Siva
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A145 - A145
  • [33] The estimation of costs attributable to nosocomial infection: Prolongation of hospitalization and calculation of alternative costs
    Pena, C
    Pujol, M
    Pallares, R
    Corbella, X
    Vidal, T
    Tortras, N
    Ariza, J
    Gudiol, F
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 1996, 106 (12): : 441 - 444
  • [34] PERCEPTIONS OF ROBOTIC SURGERY AMONGST PATIENTS TREATED WITH ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Lerner, Michelle A.
    Bowens, Rudolph, Jr.
    Sreshta, Nicholas
    Sundaram, Chandru P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 720 - 721
  • [35] ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERY REDUCES RECTAL INJURY RATES IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PATIENTS
    Tamaddon, Kirk
    Chien, Gary
    Pathak, Apurba
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A11 - A12
  • [36] The Impact of Previous Inguinal or Abdominal Surgery on Outcomes After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Siddiqui, Sameer A.
    Krane, Louis S.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Patel, Manish N.
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Stricker, Hans
    Peabody, James O.
    Menon, Mani
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2010, 75 (05) : 1079 - 1082
  • [37] Outpatient Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Matched-Pair Comparison with Inpatient Surgery
    Berger, Andre K.
    Chopra, Sameer
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Aron, Monish
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 : S52 - S56
  • [38] Robotic radical prostatectomy following previous transurethral prostate surgery: Lessons learned
    Eun, Daniel
    Boris, Ronald
    Muhletaler, Fred
    Baliga, Mithun
    Shrivastava, Alok
    Ogunfidimi, Folusho
    Menon, Mani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 209 - 210
  • [39] Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region
    Mustafa, Mahmoud
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Davis, John W.
    Pisters, Louis
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 56 (02) : 131 - 137
  • [40] PERCEPTIONS OF ROBOTIC SURGERY AMONGST PATIENTS TREATED WITH ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Lerner, M.
    Bowens, R.
    Lucas, S.
    Koch, M.
    Sundaram, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A110 - A111