Hospitalization Costs for Radical Prostatectomy Attributable to Robotic Surgery

被引:41
|
作者
Kim, Simon P. [1 ]
Shah, Nilay D. [2 ]
Karnes, R. Jeffrey [1 ]
Weight, Christopher J. [3 ]
Shippee, Nathan D. [4 ]
Han, Leona C. [2 ]
Boorjian, Stephen A. [1 ]
Smaldone, Marc C. [5 ]
Frank, Igor [1 ]
Gettman, Matthew T. [1 ]
Tollefson, Matthew K. [1 ]
Thompson, R. Houston [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
Comparative effectiveness; Costs; Outcomes; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; HEALTH-CARE COSTS; CANCER; TECHNOLOGY; ECONOMICS; ADOPTION; OUTCOMES; SHARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: With health technology innovation responsible for higher health care costs, it is essential to have accurate estimates regarding the differential costs between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Objective: To describe the total hospitalization costs attributable to robotic and open surgery for radical prostatectomy (RP). Design, setting, and participants: Using a population-based cohort by merging the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the American Hospital Association (AHA) survey from 2006 to 2008, we identified 29 837 prostate cancer patients who underwent RP. Interventions: ORP and RARP. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was total hospitalization costs adjusted to year 2008 US dollars. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with total hospitalization costs and to estimate costs of ORP and RARP adjusted for case mix and hospital teaching status, location, and annual case volume. Results and limitations: Overall, 20 424 (68.5%) patients were surgically treated with RARP, and 9413 (31.5%) patients underwent ORP. Compared to ORP, patients undergoing RARP had shorter median length of stay (1 d vs 2 d; p < 0.001) and were less likely to experience any postoperative complications (8.2% vs 11.3%; p < 0.001). However, patients undergoing RARP had higher median hospitalization costs ($10 409 vs $ 8862; p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and hospital features, RARP was associated with higher total hospitalization costs compared to ORP ($11 932 vs $9390; p < 0.001). Our results are limited by a study design using retrospective population-based data. Conclusions: Despite RARP having lower complications and shorter length of stay than ORP, total hospitalization costs are higher for patients treated with RARP compared with those treated with ORP. (c) 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 16
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic Surgery Revives Radical Perineal Prostatectomy
    Akca, Oktay
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (02) : 340 - 341
  • [2] Predictors of costs for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Bolenz, Christian
    Gupta, Amit
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Lotan, Yair
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (03) : 325 - 329
  • [3] Robotic-assisted surgery and the evolution of the radical prostatectomy
    Anderson, K. M.
    Ruckle, H. C.
    Baldwin, D. D.
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2012, 64 (02) : 97 - 122
  • [4] Will robotic surgery become the gold standard for radical prostatectomy?
    Descazeaud, Aurelien
    Peyromaure, Michael
    Zerbib, Marc
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [5] The Role of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in the Era of Robotic Surgery
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Hruza, Marcel
    Klein, Jan
    Goezen, Ali S.
    Teber, Dogu
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (03) : 379 - 387
  • [6] Reducing Costs for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Three-instrument Technique
    White, Wesley M.
    Winter, Christopher A.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2016, 95 : 215 - 215
  • [7] Reducing Costs for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Three-instrument Technique
    Ramirez, Daniel
    Ganesan, Vishnu
    Nelson, Ryan J.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2016, 95 : 213 - 215
  • [8] Reducing Costs for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Three-instrument Technique
    Ramirez, Daniel
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2016, 95 : 215 - 215
  • [9] Examining the financial costs of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Gandevivala, Anisa
    Balkrishnan, Rajesh
    Shah, Ketul
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Patel, Vipul R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A148 - A148
  • [10] A combination of enhanced recovery after surgery and prehabilitation pathways improves perioperative outcomes and costs for robotic radical prostatectomy
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Almeras, Christophe
    Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
    Gautier, Jean-Romain
    Garnault, Valerie
    Fremont, Natacha
    Dallemagne, Stephanie
    Loison, Guillaume
    Salin, Ambroise
    Tollon, Christophe
    [J]. CANCER, 2020, 126 (18) : 4148 - 4155