Prediction of clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation from deceased donors with acute kidney injury: a comparison of the KDIGO and AKIN criteria

被引:26
|
作者
Kim, Jeong Ho [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Young Soo [4 ]
Choi, Min Seok [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Young Ok [4 ]
Yoon, Sun Ae [4 ]
Kim, Ji-Il [1 ,3 ]
Moon, In Sung [1 ,3 ]
Choi, Bum Soon [1 ,2 ]
Park, Cheol Whee [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Chul Woo [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Yong-Soo [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Byung Ha [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Transplant Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Dept Internal Med, 505 Banpo Dong, Seoul 137040, South Korea
[3] Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Div Nephrol, Dept Internal Med,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Acute kidney injury (AKI); Deceased donor (DD); Kidney transplantation (KT); KDIGO; AKIN; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; ACUTE-RENAL-FAILURE; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; BRAIN-DEATH; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; QUALITY; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1186/s12882-017-0461-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequently detected in deceased donors (DDs), and it could be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in corresponding kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). In this regard, we sought to identify which criteria is better between the KDIGO and AKIN criteria for the diagnosis of AKI in DDs in the prediction of clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT). Methods: Two hundred eighty-five cases of deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) were included. We divided them into three groups; the non-AKI by both KDIGO and AKIN criteria group (n = 120), the AKI by KDIGO only group (n = 61), and the AKI by both criteria group (n = 104) according to the diagnosis of AKI using the KDIGO and AKIN criteria in the corresponding 205 DDs. We compared the development of delayed graft function (DGF), the change in allograft function, the allograft survival among the three groups. Results: The incidence of DGF was significantly higher in the AKI by KDIGO only and the AKI by both criteria groups than in the non-AKI by both criteria group (P < 0.05 each). But no difference was detected between the AKI by KDIGO only group and the AKI by both criteria group (P > 0.05). Therefore, the KDIGO criteria had a better predictive value for DGF occurrence than the AKIN criteria (Area under the curve = 0.72 versus 0.63, P < 0.05) in Receiver Operation Characteristic analysis. On comparison of allograft function, the AKI by KDIGO only and the AKI by both criteria groups showed a significantly deteriorating pattern by 6 months after KT in comparison with the non-AKI by both criteria group (P < 0.05). However, the differences disappeared at 1 year from KT and long-term allograft survival did not differ among the three groups. AKI stage either by KDIGO or AKIN in DDs did not affect long-term allograft survival in corresponding KTRs as well. Conclusions: The KDIGO criteria may be more useful for predicting DGF than the AKIN criteria. However, AKI or AKI stage by either criteria in DDs failed to affect long-term allograft outcomes in KTRs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes and Utilization of Kidneys from Deceased Donors with Acute Kidney Injury
    Kayler, L. K.
    Garzon, P.
    Magliocca, J.
    Fujita, S.
    Kim, R. D.
    Hemming, A. W.
    Howard, R.
    Schold, J. D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 (02) : 367 - 373
  • [32] Outcomes of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Using Kidneys of Deceased Donors With Acute Kidney Injury
    Batra, Ramesh K.
    Ariyamuthu, Venkatesh K.
    MacConmara, Malcolm P.
    Gupta, Gaurav
    Gungor, Ahmet B.
    Tanriover, Bekir
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 28 (06) : 983 - 997
  • [33] ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY CLASSIFICATION: COMPARISON OF AKIN AND RIFLE CRITERIA
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Lin, Chan-Yu
    Tian, Ya-Chung
    Jenq, Chang-Chyi
    Chang, Ming-Yang
    Chen, Yung-Chang
    Fang, Ji-Tseng
    Yang, Chih-Wei
    SHOCK, 2010, 33 (03): : 247 - 252
  • [34] Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation from Donors with Acute Kidney Injury: Realities and Costs.
    Iskhagi, S.
    Shahbazov, R.
    Ball, A.
    Loerzel, S.
    Shaban, E.
    Gallay, B.
    Dvorai, R. Hod
    Leggat, J.
    Hanlon, M.
    Saidi, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 663 - 663
  • [35] Comparison Between RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO: Acute Kidney Injury Definition Criteria for Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients
    Er, Ramazan Erdem
    Okyay, Gulay Ulusal
    Bikmaz, Gulbin Aygencel
    Turkoglu, MeIda
    Erten, Yasemin
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2020, 14 (05) : 365 - 372
  • [36] Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury as Defined by the AKIN Criteria Post-Heart Transplantation.
    Stephany, Brian R.
    Demirjian, Sevag
    Poggio, Emilio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : 649 - 649
  • [37] Excellent clinical outcomes of renal transplant from pediatric deceased donors with acute kidney injury
    Qiuhao Liu
    Hedong Zhang
    Mingda Zhong
    Liang Tan
    Shanbiao Hu
    Longkai Peng
    Xubiao Xie
    Gongbin Lan
    European Journal of Medical Research, 28
  • [38] Excellent clinical outcomes of renal transplant from pediatric deceased donors with acute kidney injury
    Liu, Qiuhao
    Zhang, Hedong
    Zhong, Mingda
    Tan, Liang
    Hu, Shanbiao
    Peng, Longkai
    Xie, Xubiao
    Lan, Gongbin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [39] Kidney nonprocurement in deceased donors with acute kidney injury
    Yu, Kathleen
    Husain, Syed A.
    King, Kristen
    Stevens, Jacob S.
    Parikh, Chirag R.
    Mohan, Sumit
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 36 (11)
  • [40] KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION FROM EXPANDED CRITERIA DECEASED DONOR: COMPARISON WITH IDEAL DECEASED DONORS AND NON-EXPANDED CRITERIA DONORS
    Kim, J. I.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 31 : 33 - 33