Criticality Assessment of Lifeline Infrastructure for Enhancing Disaster Response

被引:37
|
作者
Oh, Eun Ho [1 ]
Deshmukh, Abhijeet [2 ]
Hastak, Makarand [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst Construct Technol, Construct Syst Innovat Res Dept, Construct Management & Econ Res Div, Goyang Si 411712, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Purdue Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Div Construct Engn & Management, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Div Construct Engn & Management, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Criticality assessment; Critical infrastructure; Interrelationships; Natural disaster; Decision support system; VULNERABILITY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000084
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In normal and hazardous situations, critical infrastructure systems such as roads, bridges, electricity, gas, and waste treatment facilities play a very crucial role in sustaining communities and industries. It is thus very important to examine the functional and structural stability of these supporting infrastructure systems. An assessment analyzing the criticality of infrastructure systems should be performed before impact of facing extreme events, such as hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes. The criticality assessment involves using a decision support system that incorporates vulnerability and severity assessments to provide emergency agencies and experts, relevant information that will facilitate an enhanced disaster mitigation response. This paper introduces the criticality assessment based on the interrelationships between the critical infrastructure systems, associated industries, and communities. The social, economic, and technical data of the 2008 Midwest floods were collected through interviews, site investigations, and survey questionnaires as a part of this research. Methodology includes the zone of influence of critical infrastructure, activity analysis, social and economic contribution, and priority analysis between the activities and infrastructure systems. Finally, the relative criticality levels of infrastructure systems were derived. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000084. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 107
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Building Information Modeling of Urban Lifeline Disaster Prevention and Mitigation
    Liu, Yang
    Guan, Cangsheng
    Wang, Wei
    DISASTER ADVANCES, 2013, 6 : 283 - 289
  • [42] Adaptive pathways for disaster-resilient infrastructure: resilience assessment as a fundamental requirement
    Joo, Mohammad Rafiq
    Sinha, Ravi
    SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE, 2023, 8 : 93 - 98
  • [43] Recommendations toward Functional Recovery Performance of Lifeline Infrastructure Systems
    Davis, Craig A.
    Kersting, Ryan
    Nikolaou, Sissy
    Yu, Kent
    LIFELINES 2022: ADVANCING LIFELINE ENGINEERING FOR COMMUNITY RESILIENCE, 2022, : 756 - 766
  • [44] Flood disaster risk assessment for critical transportation infrastructure under climate change
    Gupta, Kapil
    Nikam, Vinay
    SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE, 2023, 8 : 38 - 44
  • [46] Increasing community resilience through improved lifeline infrastructure performance
    Rojahn, Christopher
    Johnson, Laurie
    O’rourke, Thomas D.
    Cedillos, Veronica
    McAllister, Therese P.
    McCabe, Steven L.
    Bridge, 1600, 49 (02): : 34 - 42
  • [47] Disaster Response or Response as Disaster?
    Baruch, Jay
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2014, 44 (02) : 46 - 47
  • [48] Assessing earthquake risks to lifeline infrastructure systems in the United States
    Kwong, N. Simon
    Jaiswal, Kishor S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, 2025, 49
  • [49] From Awareness to Action: Accounting for Infrastructure Interdependencies in Disaster Response and Recovery Planning
    Narayanan, Anu
    Finucane, Melissa
    Acosta, Joie
    Wicker, Amanda
    GEOHEALTH, 2020, 4 (08):
  • [50] INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL - DISASTER OR OPPORTUNITY
    HALE, D
    ANDERSON, JH
    ABREW, FH
    ALLEN, JE
    DIBRITA, AJ
    DODGE, RC
    HARRIS, TE
    HOLDER, RH
    KEITHLY, R
    LAURSEN, G
    YAEGER, AG
    PIPELINE & GAS JOURNAL, 1983, 210 (13) : 18 - +