Step by step. The benefits of stage-based R&D licensing contracts

被引:22
|
作者
Crama, Pascale [1 ]
De Reyck, Bert [2 ]
Degraeve, Zeger [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, Singapore 178899, Singapore
[2] UCL, Dept Management Sci & Innovat, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Melbourne Business Sch, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[4] London Business Sch, Dept Management Sci & Operat, London NW1 4SA, England
关键词
Research and development; Innovation; Contract design; Asymmetric information; Industries; Pharmaceutical; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; DESIGN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.014
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We examine how a licensor can optimally design licensing contracts for multi-phase R&D projects when he does not know the licensee's project valuation, leading to adverse selection, and cannot enforce the licensee's effort level, resulting in moral hazard. We focus on the effect of the phased nature typical of such projects, and compare single-phase and multi-phase contracts. We determine the optimal values for the upfront payment, milestone payments and royalties, and the optimal timing for outlicensing. Including multiple milestones and accompanying payments can be an effective way of discriminating between licensees holding different valuations, without having to manipulate the royalty rate, which induces licensees to invest less, resulting in lower project values and socially suboptimal solutions. Interestingly, we also find that multiple milestone payments are beneficial even when the licensor is risk-averse, contrary to standard contract theory results, which recommend that only an upfront payment should be used. In terms of licensing timing, we show that the optimal time depends on the licensor's risk aversion, the characteristics of the licensee and the project value. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 582
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] R&D tax credit benefits praised
    不详
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1998, 76 (04) : 23 - 23
  • [32] The economic benefits of big science R&D: With a focus on fusion R&D program in Korea
    Choi, Wonjae
    Tho, Hyunsoo
    Kim, Youbean
    Hwang, Sungha
    Kang, Dongyup
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2017, 124 : 1263 - 1268
  • [33] A Comparison of Milestone-Based and Buyout Options Contracts for Coordinating R&D Partnerships
    Bhattacharya, Shantanu
    Gaba, Vibha
    Hasija, Sameer
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (05) : 963 - 978
  • [34] Quality in (analytical) R&D -: ideas for the next step after EURACHEM/CITAC Guide 2
    Cammann, K
    Kleiböhmer, W
    [J]. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2001, 6 (02) : 72 - 73
  • [35] An ambitious step to the future desalination technology: SEAHERO R&D program (2007-2012)
    Kim S.
    Oh B.S.
    Hwang M.-H.
    Hong S.
    Kim J.H.
    Lee S.
    Kim I.S.
    [J]. Applied Water Science, 2011, 1 (1-2) : 11 - 17
  • [36] Quality in (analytical) R&D – ideas for the next step after EURACHEM/CITAC Guide 2
    Karl Cammann
    W. Kleiböhmer
    [J]. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2001, 6 : 72 - 73
  • [37] How Angel Know-How Shapes Ownership Sharing in Stage-Based Contracts
    Erzurumlu, S. Sinan
    Joglekar, Nitin
    Levesque, Moren
    Tanrisever, Fehmi
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 43 (04) : 773 - 801
  • [38] Indemnification, Monitoring, and Competition: Evidence from R&D Contracts
    Guo, Di
    Hua, Xinyu
    Jiang, Kun
    [J]. AMERICAN LAW AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 24 (01) : 203 - 246
  • [39] Contractual Complexity and the Cognitive Load of R&D Alliance Contracts
    Hagedoorn, John
    Hesen, Geerte
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2009, 6 (04) : 818 - 847
  • [40] Managerial Delegation Contracts, "Green" R&D and Emissions Taxation
    Poyago-Theotoky, Joanna
    Yong, Soo Keong
    [J]. B E JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 19 (02):