Structural health monitoring in strategies for life-cycle management of dikes: a case study in the north of the Netherlands

被引:0
|
作者
Klerk, W. J. [1 ]
Kanning, W. [1 ]
van der Meer, M. T. [2 ]
Nieuwenhuis, J. W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Deltares, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Fugro GeoServ BV, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Waterschap Noorderzijlvest, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In recent years there has been an increasing focus on life-cycle and asset management as a means of managing systems of ageing infrastructure. To accurately assess performance, structural health monitoring can be an important means. In this paper a tool is presented which assesses the costs and benefits of structural health monitoring in life-cycle management strategies for dikes. The tool is based on and applied to the Ommelanderzeedijk, an old sea dike in the north of the Netherlands that didn't pass its last safety assessment. Waterschap Noorderzijlvest has applied several monitoring techniques over the past years, such as piezometric head monitoring and temperature measurements as well as a failure test. These experiments have provided a variety of valuable information, which has led to a more effective design for the upcoming reinforcement. This case focuses on assessing the benefits of monitoring of the phreatic level in the dike body. With the developed tool, various strategies for monitoring can be compared based on their Net Present Value. Although in the actual case the benefits of monitoring were enormous, it is also shows that this can vary greatly depending on the case and that the amount of risk one needs to take in order to obtain information is pivotal in this analysis. However, it can be concluded that structural health monitoring should be an important part of life-cycle management of flood defences.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 589
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Study on the Life-Cycle Health Monitoring Technology of Water-Rich Loess Tunnel
    Xue, Xiaohui
    Xie, Yongli
    Zhou, Xinxing
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [22] Life-cycle of structural systems: design, assessment, maintenance and management
    Furuta, Hitoshi
    Akiyama, Mitsuyoshi
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2017, 13 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [23] Structural Health Monitoring Supports Life Cycle Management of US Army Helicopters
    White, D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2008, 2008, : 1192 - 1199
  • [24] Streicker Bridge: initial evaluation of life-cycle cost benefits of various structural health monitoring approaches
    Glisic, B.
    Adriaenssens, S.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE OPTIMIZATION, 2010, : 2120 - 2126
  • [25] Design of intelligent composites with life-cycle health management capabilities
    Rosania, Colleen L.
    Larrosa, Cecilia C.
    Chang, Fu-Kuo
    HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2015, 2015, 9438
  • [26] Life-Cycle Cost Comparison of Corrosion Management Strategies for Steel Bridges
    Kere, Kiswendsida J.
    Huang, Qindan
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2019, 24 (04)
  • [27] Study on Prospects of Building Life-cycle Management in China
    Chang Yuan
    Wang Yaowu
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 10 - 14
  • [28] Bridge maintenance, monitoring, management, risk, life-cycle performance and optimization
    Yokota, Hiroshi
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    Akiyama, Mitsuyoshi
    Tsompanakis, Yiannis
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (10-11) : 1377 - 1378
  • [29] Role of monitoring in life-cycle assessment, prediction and management of deteriorating structures
    Okasha, N. M.
    Frangopol, D. M.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE-CYCLE OPTIMIZATION, 2010, : 1564 - 1571
  • [30] Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study
    Fay, R
    Treloar, G
    Iyer-Raniga, U
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2000, 28 (01): : 31 - 41