Pathologic fractures of the proximal femur secondary to benign bone tumors

被引:0
|
作者
Wai, EK [1 ]
Davis, AM [1 ]
Griffin, A [1 ]
Bell, RS [1 ]
Wunder, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Pathologic fractures of the proximal femur secondary to benign bone tumors often are difficult to treat because of specific anatomic features of this region and the aggressiveness of the tumors. Between 1986 and 1996, 11 patients presented with a pathologic fracture of the proximal femur secondary to a benign bone tumor. All were treated with a uniform approach consisting of biopsy, intralesional curettage, high-speed burring, and reconstruction using morselized allograft, autograft, and a fixed-angle implant. The average followup was 4 years 3 months (range, 24-114 months). One patient was lost to followup. All fractures healed, and there were no local recurrences and no cases of avascular necrosis. Functional evaluation revealed generally good results. Patients scored a mean of 32.6 on the original Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scale and 95.8 on the revised version. The average Toronto Extremity Salvage Score was 91.3. With the numbers available, there were no significant differences between the study group and population norms in the Short Form-36. These results suggest that a uniform approach based on preservation of the femoral head can be applied successfully to the treatment of these lesions with good local tumor control, fracture healing, and acceptable functional outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 286
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INCIDENCE OF FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR
    MIRAVET, L
    GAZETTE MEDICALE, 1991, 98 (17): : 23 - 28
  • [42] PATHOLOGICAL FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR
    FRIEDL, W
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1995, 120 (11): : 873 - 880
  • [43] EPIDEMIOLOGY OF FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR
    COSTE, J
    PIETTE, F
    LEPARC, JM
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1992, 21 (02): : 76 - 82
  • [44] REOPERATIONS FOR FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR
    LUTHJE, P
    ANNALES CHIRURGIAE ET GYNAECOLOGIAE, 1986, 75 (06) : 337 - 340
  • [45] Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement for Salvage of Failed Fixation of Malignant Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures
    Johnson, Joshua D.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    Yuan, Brandon J.
    Rose, Peter S.
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (04): : 700 - 703
  • [46] Periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur
    Strauss, A. C.
    Koob, S.
    Jansen, T. R.
    Wirtz, D. C.
    CHIRURG, 2020, 91 (10): : 804 - 812
  • [47] SURVEY OF FRACTURES OF PROXIMAL FEMUR
    SMITH, JAR
    MCLAUCHLAN, J
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1975, 6 (03): : 196 - 201
  • [48] The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur
    Cordey, J
    Schneider, M
    Bühler, M
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2000, 31 : 56 - 61
  • [49] FRACTURES OF PROXIMAL FEMUR IN OSLO
    FALCH, JA
    ILEBEKK, A
    CALCIFIED TISSUE RESEARCH, 1977, 24 : R8 - R8
  • [50] INTRACAPSULAR FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR
    PERRY, CR
    CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 1994, 10 (04) : 647 - 657