Rice yield components as affected by cultivar and seeding rate

被引:40
|
作者
Ottis, BV
Talbert, RE
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Plant Sci, Portageville, MO 63873 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop & Soil Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2005.0123
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
New rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars have been released that possess yield potential > 10 000 kg ha(-1). Some of these new cultivars have increased costs associated with them due to patented input traits and/or hybrid technology. Research analyzing the effects of seeding rate on yield components with modern cultivars is not well-documented. Therefore, field trials were conducted near Stuttgart, AR, in 2002 through 2004 with the objective of determining the effect of rice seeding rate on yield components of three modern, long-grain rice cultivars. This research was done in an effort to determine if lower-than-recommended seeding rates would produce yields similar to currently recommended rates. Rice seeding rates from 57 to 500 seeds m(-2) resulting in a rice density range of 73 to 373 plants m(-2) did not effect rice aboveground biomass production, panicle density, harvest index (111), or rice yield, regardless of cultivar. 'Wells' produced higher panicle weights and had a higher 111 than 'CL161' across the range of rice densities. Cultivars XL8 and Wells produced similar yields, and these yields were higher than CL161. Cultivar, rice density, and thermal time were significant factors affecting rice canopy coverage. Cultivar XL8 achieved canopy coverage sooner than CL161 or Wells. As rice density increased, canopy coverage increased by 3% for every additional 100 plants m(-2). As degree days (DD50) accumulated, canopy coverage increased 0.4% degrees Cd-1. Results from this study indicate that recommended seeding rates for CL161, Wells, and XL8 can be reduced while maintaining similar yields.
引用
收藏
页码:1622 / 1625
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Yield and Composition of Sweet Pearl Millet as Affected by Row Spacing and Seeding Rate
    Bouchard, Audrey
    Vanasse, Anne
    Seguin, Philippe
    Belanger, Gilles
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2011, 103 (04) : 995 - 1001
  • [32] Soybean yield and profitability are affected by the spatial distribution of seeds in rows and seeding rate
    Coelho, Antonio Eduardo
    Sangoi, Luis
    Sapucay, Moryb Jorge Lima da Costa
    Bratti, Felipe
    Balbinot Jr, Alvadi Antonio
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2024, 116 (01) : 247 - 259
  • [33] Effect of seeding date, environment and cultivar on soybean seed yield, yield components, and seed quality in the Northern Great Plains
    MacMillan, Kristen P.
    Gulden, Robert H.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2020, 112 (03) : 1666 - 1678
  • [34] Stability of Rice Grain and Whole Kernel Milling Yield is Affected by Cultivar and Date of Planting
    Blanche, Sterling B.
    Linscombe, Steve D.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2009, 101 (03) : 522 - 528
  • [35] The effect of seeding rate and nitrogen fertilization on barley yield and yield components in a cool maritime climate
    Spaner, D
    Todd, AG
    McKenzie, DB
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2001, 187 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [36] Cultivar and seeding date effects on kernel smut of rice
    Slaton, Nathan A.
    DeLong, Russell E.
    Norman, Richard J.
    Cartwright, Richard D.
    Wilson, Charles E., Jr.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (02) : 521 - 529
  • [37] Seeding rate and genotype effects on weeds and yield of dry-seeded rice
    Mahajan, G.
    Kaur, G.
    Chauhan, B. S.
    CROP PROTECTION, 2017, 96 : 68 - 76
  • [38] Tillage and seeding rate effects on wheat cultivars: II. Yield components
    Carr, PM
    Horsley, RD
    Poland, WW
    CROP SCIENCE, 2003, 43 (01) : 210 - 218
  • [39] EFFECT OF SEEDING RATE ON GRAIN YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS OF BREAD WHEAT CULTIVARS
    Baktash, F. Y.
    Ibraihi, Mohammed A.
    IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2007, 38 (01): : 65 - 78
  • [40] Dryland corn yield affected by row configuration and seeding rate in the northern Great Plains
    Allen, B. L.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2012, 67 (01) : 32 - 41