Decision-Making after Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormality

被引:53
|
作者
Bijma, Hilmar H. [1 ]
van der Heide, Agnes [2 ]
Wildschut, Hajo I. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
fetal abnormality; prenatal screening; ultrasound; parental decision-making; end-of-life decisions;
D O I
10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31372-X
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
During the last few decades, the use of ultrasonography for the detection of fetal abnormalities has become widespread in many industrialised countries. This resulted in a shift in timing of the diagnosis of congenital abnormalities in infants from the neonatal period to the prenatal period. This has major implications for both clinicians and the couples involved. In case of ultrasound diagnosis Of fetal anomaly there are several options for the obstetric management, ranging from standard care to non-aggressive care to termination of pregnancy This essay explores the context of both clinical and parental decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality, with emphasis on the Dutch situation. While normal findings at ultrasound examination hove strong beneficial psychological effects on the pregnant woman and her partner, the Couple are often ill-prepared for bad news about the health of their unborn child in the case of abnormal findings. When parents consider end-of-life decisions, they experience both ambivalent and emotional feelings. On the one hand, they are committed to their pregnancy; on the other hand, they wont to protect their child, themselves and the family from the burden of severe disability These complex parental reactions hove implications for the counselling strategy. (c) 2007 Springer. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 89
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Value of Prenatal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Fetal Ductus Venosus Abnormality
    Yan, Huaying
    Zhang, Chunguo
    Zhang, Yan
    Kang, Yu
    He, Lihong
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 50 (07):
  • [22] Cancer in pregnancy: maternal and fetal implications on decision-making
    Gambino, A.
    Gorio, A.
    Carrara, L.
    Agoni, L.
    Franzini, R.
    Lupi, G. P.
    Maggino, T.
    Romagnolo, C.
    Sartori, E.
    Pecorelli, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 32 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [23] The distortion of criteria after decision-making
    Phillips, F
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 88 (02) : 769 - 784
  • [24] PARENTAL DECISION FOLLOWING PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS OF FETAL CHROMOSOME ABNORMALITY
    VERP, MS
    BOMBARD, AT
    SIMPSON, JL
    ELIAS, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1988, 29 (03): : 613 - 622
  • [25] EVALUATION, DIAGNOSIS, AND PREDICTION IN PAROLE DECISION-MAKING
    CARROLL, JS
    WIENER, RL
    COATES, D
    GALEGHER, J
    ALIBRIO, JJ
    [J]. LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1982, 17 (01) : 199 - 228
  • [26] Diagnostic Decision-Making and Strategies to Improve Diagnosis
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    Cutrer, William B.
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT HEALTH CARE, 2013, 43 (09) : 232 - 241
  • [27] MR Spectroscopy in Diagnosis and Neurological Decision-Making
    Xu, Victor
    Chan, Henry
    Lin, Alexander P.
    Sailasuta, Napapon
    Valencerina, Samuel
    Tran, Thao
    Hovener, Jan
    Ross, Brian D.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2008, 28 (04) : 407 - 422
  • [28] AUTONOMY IN DECISION-MAKING IN PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS
    SJOGREN, B
    [J]. FREE WOMAN: WOMENS HEALTH IN THE 1990S, 1989, : 218 - 224
  • [29] Novel decision-making technique for damage diagnosis
    Gelman, L.
    Murray, B.
    Patel, T. H.
    Thomson, A.
    [J]. INSIGHT, 2013, 55 (08) : 428 - 432
  • [30] Signatures for Assessment, Diagnosis and Decision-Making in Ageing
    Eklund, Patrik
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING AND MANAGEMENT OF UNCERTAINTY IN KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS: APPLICATIONS, PT II, 2010, 81 : 271 - 279