Decision-Making after Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormality

被引:53
|
作者
Bijma, Hilmar H. [1 ]
van der Heide, Agnes [2 ]
Wildschut, Hajo I. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
fetal abnormality; prenatal screening; ultrasound; parental decision-making; end-of-life decisions;
D O I
10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31372-X
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
During the last few decades, the use of ultrasonography for the detection of fetal abnormalities has become widespread in many industrialised countries. This resulted in a shift in timing of the diagnosis of congenital abnormalities in infants from the neonatal period to the prenatal period. This has major implications for both clinicians and the couples involved. In case of ultrasound diagnosis Of fetal anomaly there are several options for the obstetric management, ranging from standard care to non-aggressive care to termination of pregnancy This essay explores the context of both clinical and parental decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality, with emphasis on the Dutch situation. While normal findings at ultrasound examination hove strong beneficial psychological effects on the pregnant woman and her partner, the Couple are often ill-prepared for bad news about the health of their unborn child in the case of abnormal findings. When parents consider end-of-life decisions, they experience both ambivalent and emotional feelings. On the one hand, they are committed to their pregnancy; on the other hand, they wont to protect their child, themselves and the family from the burden of severe disability These complex parental reactions hove implications for the counselling strategy. (c) 2007 Springer. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 89
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Parental decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of a serious foetal abnormality
    Bijma, HH
    Wildschut, HIJ
    van der Heide, A
    Passchier, J
    Wladimiroff, JW
    van der Maas, PJ
    [J]. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2005, 20 (05) : 321 - 327
  • [2] Obesity and the challenges of ultrasound fetal abnormality diagnosis
    Tsai, Pai-Jong Stacy
    Loichinger, Matthew
    Zalud, Ivica
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 320 - 327
  • [3] Individual decision-making after detection of a severe fetal malformation
    Heider, Ulrike
    Steger, Florian
    [J]. ETHIK IN DER MEDIZIN, 2014, 26 (04) : 269 - 285
  • [4] Decision-making without a diagnosis
    Elce, Y. A.
    [J]. EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION, 2016, 28 (12) : 665 - 667
  • [5] Diagnosis and Decision-Making in Telemedicine
    Pappas, Yannis
    Vseteckova, Jitka
    Mastellos, Nikolas
    Greenfield, Geva
    Randhawa, Gurch
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2019, 6 (04): : 296 - 304
  • [6] Feelings of women regarding end-of-life decision making after ultrasound diagnosis of a lethal fetal malformation
    Benute, Glaucia R. G.
    Nomura, Roseli M. Y.
    Liao, Adolfo W.
    Brizot, Maria de Lourdes
    de Lucia, Mara C. S.
    Zugaib, M.
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2012, 28 (04) : 472 - 475
  • [7] The ShaDeS (Shared Decision-making in Stillbirth) study: Information, communication and shared decision-making after a stillbirth diagnosis in Italy
    Ravaldi, Claudia
    Mercuro, Chiara
    Mosconi, Laura
    Roper, Francesca
    Lotto, Lorella
    Vannacci, Alfredo
    Gavaruzzi, Teresa
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (02) : NP171 - NP172
  • [8] Ethical issues and decision-making in fetal cardiology
    Kawataki, M
    [J]. PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 41 (06) : 733 - 736
  • [9] BEHAVIORAL DIAGNOSIS AS A TOOL FOR DECISION-MAKING
    MORISKY, DE
    LEVINE, DM
    WARD, WB
    GREEN, LW
    BENSON, P
    BONE, L
    SCHUETZ, G
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1980, 9 (03) : 447 - 447
  • [10] SOLUBLE - DECISION-MAKING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF JAUNDICE
    ALTON, EWFW
    NEWMAN, N
    HOOPER, J
    FOK, D
    VICARY, FR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-MEDICAL COMPUTING, 1991, 27 (01): : 47 - 57