Improvements in site-specific quality of life 6 months after endoscopic anterior skull base surgery: a prospective study

被引:76
|
作者
McCoul, Edward D. [2 ]
Anand, Vijay K. [2 ]
Schwartz, Theodore H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Neurol Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Neurol & Neurosci, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
endonasal surgery; endoscopic surgery; cranial base skull base; reconstruction; quality of life; outcomes research; PATIENTS PERSPECTIVE; ACOUSTIC NEUROMA; VALIDITY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.3171/2012.6.JNS111066
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. Endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) is a minimal-access technique that provides an alternative to traditional approaches. Patient-reported outcomes are becoming increasingly important in measuring the success of surgical interventions. Endoscopic skull base surgery may lead to improvements in quality of life (QOL) since natural orifices are used to reach the pathology; however, sinonasal QOL may be negatively affected. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of ESBS on both site-specific QOL, using the Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire (ASBQ), and sinonasal-related QOL, using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Methods. Consecutive patients from a tertiary referral center who were undergoing ESBS were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients completed the ASBQ and SNOT-22 preoperatively as well as at regular intervals after ESBS. Results. Sixty-six patients were included in the study, and 57.6% of them had pituitary adenoma. There was no significant decline or improvement in the ASBQ-measured QOL at 3 and 6 weeks after ESBS, but there were significant improvements at 12 weeks and 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). Improvements were noted in all but one ASBQ subdomain at 12 weeks and 6 months postsurgery (p < 0.05). Preoperative QOL was significantly worse in patients who had undergone revision surgery and significantly improved postoperatively in patients who underwent gross-total resection (p < 0.05). Scores on the SNOT-22 worsened at 3 weeks postoperatively and returned to baseline thereafter. The presence of a nasoseptal flap or a graft-donor site did not contribute to a decreased QOL. Conclusions. Endoscopic skull base surgery is associated with an improvement in postoperative site-specific QOL as compared with the preoperative QOL. Short-term improvements are greater if gross-total resection is achieved. Sinonasal QOL transiently declines and then returns to preoperative baseline levels. Endoscopic skull base surgery is a valuable tool in the neurosurgical management of anterior skull base pathology, leading to improvements in site-specific QOL. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.6.JNS111066)
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 506
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study
    Rioja, Elena
    Bernal-Sprekelsen, Manuel
    Enriquez, Karla
    Ensenat, Joaquim
    Valero, Ricard
    de Notaris, Matteo
    Mullol, Joaquim
    Alobid, Isam
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 273 (07) : 1809 - 1817
  • [42] Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study
    Elena Rioja
    Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
    Karla Enriquez
    Joaquim Enseñat
    Ricard Valero
    Matteo de Notaris
    Joaquim Mullol
    Isam Alobid
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2016, 273 : 1809 - 1817
  • [43] Patient Wellbeing and Quality of Life After Nasoseptal Flap Closure for Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction
    Castle-Kirszbaum, Mendel
    Wang, Yi Yuen
    King, James
    Uren, Brent
    Dixon, Ben
    Zhao, Yi Chen
    Lim, Kai-Zheong
    Goldschlager, Tony
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 74 : 87 - 92
  • [44] Comparison of Quality of Life After Transnasal Endoscopic vs Open Skull Base Tumor Resection
    Abergel, Avraham
    Cavel, Oren
    Margalit, Nevo
    Fliss, Dan M.
    Gil, Ziv
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2012, 138 (02) : 142 - 147
  • [45] A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial for Lumbar Drain Placement after Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
    Zwagerman, Nathan T.
    Shin, Samuel
    Zenonos, Georgios
    Wang, Eric
    Fernandez-Miranda, Juan
    Snyderman, Carl
    Gardner, Paul
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 124 (04) : A1189 - A1189
  • [46] Sleep and quality of life improvements after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
    Alt, Jeremiah A.
    Smith, Timothy L.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    Mace, Jess C.
    Soler, Zachary M.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2014, 4 (09) : 693 - 701
  • [47] A piezoelectric device for bone work in endoscopic anterior skull base surgery - a feasibility study in 15 patients
    Gellner, V.
    Koele, W.
    Wolf, A.
    Gerstenberger, C.
    Mokry, M.
    Stammberger, H.
    Tomazic, P., V
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 42 (04) : 927 - 931
  • [48] Gender Differences in Quality-of-Life Outcome in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery
    Tumlin, Parker
    Al-Asadi, Zayd
    Turner, Meghan
    Ramadan, Hassan H.
    Makary, Chadi A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2024, 85 : e80 - e85
  • [49] Quality-of-life instruments in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery-A practical systematic review
    Shukla, Aishwarya
    Ahmed, Omar G.
    Orlov, Cinthia P.
    Price, Carrie
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    Choby, Garret
    Rowan, Nicholas R.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2021, 11 (08) : 1264 - 1268
  • [50] Adherus Dural Sealant in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: Safety, Imaging Characteristics, and Sinonasal Quality of Life
    Soneru, Christian P.
    Riley, Charles A.
    Minkowitz, Shlomo
    Tabaee, Abtin
    Anand, Vijay K.
    Schwartz, Theodore H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2020, 81 (06) : 659 - 663