Evaluating the vegetation-atmosphere coupling strength of ORCHIDEE land surface model (v7266)

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Yuan [1 ,2 ]
Narayanappa, Devaraju [1 ]
Ciais, Philippe [1 ]
Li, Wei [3 ]
Goll, Daniel [1 ]
Vuichard, Nicolas [1 ]
De Kauwe, Martin G. [4 ]
Li, Laurent [2 ]
Maignan, Fabienne [1 ]
机构
[1] UVSQ, Lab Sci Climat & Environm LSCE, CEA, CNRS,IPSL, Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] Sorbonne Univ, Lab Meteorol Dynam, IPSL, CNRS, Paris, France
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Global Change Studies, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Minist Educ,Key Lab Earth Syst Modeling, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol BS8 1TQ, England
关键词
CANOPY STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; LEAF-AREA INDEX; DECOUPLING COEFFICIENT; BOUNDARY-LAYER; TRANSPIRATION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FOREST; EVAPORATION; PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-15-9111-2022
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Plant transpiration dominates terrestrial latent heat fluxes (LE) and plays a central role in regulating the water cycle and land surface energy budget. However, Earth system models (ESMs) currently disagree strongly on the amount of transpiration, and thus LE, leading to large uncertainties in simulating future climate. Therefore, it is crucial to correctly represent the mechanisms controlling the transpiration in models. At the leaf scale, transpiration is controlled by stomatal regulation, and at the canopy scale, through turbulence, which is a function of canopy structure and wind. The coupling of vegetation to the atmosphere can be characterized by the coefficient omega. A value of omega & RARR;0 implies a strong coupling of vegetation and the atmosphere, leaving a dominant role to stomatal conductance in regulating water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes, while omega -> 1 implies a complete decoupling of leaves from the atmosphere, i.e., the transfer of H2O and CO2 is limited by aerodynamic transport. In this study, we investigated how well the land surface model (LSM) Organising Carbon and Hydrology In Dynamic Ecosystems (ORCHIDEE) (v7266) simulates the coupling of vegetation to the atmosphere by using empirical daily estimates of omega derived from flux measurements from 90 FLUXNET sites. Our results show that ORCHIDEE generally captures the omega in forest vegetation types (0.27 +/- 0.12) compared with observation (0.26 +/- 0.09) but underestimates omega in grasslands (GRA) and croplands (CRO) (0.25 +/- 0.15 for model, 0.33 +/- 0.17 for observation). The good model performance in forests is due to compensation of biases in surface conductance (Gs) and aerodynamic conductance (Ga). Calibration of key parameters controlling the dependence of the stomatal conductance to the water vapor deficit (VPD) improves the simulated Gs and omega estimates in grasslands and croplands (0.28 +/- 0.20). To assess the underlying controls of omega, we applied random forest (RF) models to both simulated and observation-based omega. We found that large observed omega are associated with periods of low wind speed, high temperature and low VPD; it is also related to sites with large leaf area index (LAI) and/or short vegetation. The RF models applied to ORCHIDEE output generally agree with this pattern. However, we found that the ORCHIDEE underestimated the sensitivity of omega to VPD when the VPD is high, overestimated the impact of the LAI on omega, and did not correctly simulate the temperature dependence of omega when temperature is high. Our results highlight the importance of observational constraints on simulating the vegetation-atmosphere coupling strength, which can help to improve predictive accuracy of water fluxes in Earth system models.
引用
收藏
页码:9111 / 9125
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] Evaluating the Met Office Unified Model land surface temperature in Global Atmosphere/Land 3.1 (GA/L3.1), Global Atmosphere/Land 6.1 (GA/L6.1) and limited area 2.2 km configurations
    Brooke, Jennifer K.
    Harlow, R. Chawn
    Scott, Russell L.
    Best, Martin J.
    Edwards, John M.
    Thelen, Jean-Claude
    Weeks, Mark
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (04) : 1703 - 1724
  • [32] Land surface model parameter optimisation using in situ flux data: comparison of gradient-based versus random search algorithms (a case study using ORCHIDEE v1.9.5.2)
    Bastrikov, Vladislav
    MacBean, Natasha
    Bacour, Cedric
    Santaren, Diego
    Kuppel, Sylvain
    Peylin, Philippe
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 11 (12) : 4739 - 4754
  • [33] A comprehensive land-surface vegetation model for multi-stream data assimilation, D&B v1.0
    Knorr, Wolfgang
    Williams, Matthew
    Thum, Tea
    Kaminski, Thomas
    Vossbeck, Michael
    Scholze, Marko
    Quaife, Tristan
    Smallman, T. Luke
    Steele-Dunne, Susan C.
    Vreugdenhil, Mariette
    Green, Tim
    Zaehle, Soenke
    Aurela, Mika
    Bouvet, Alexandre
    Bueechi, Emanuel
    Dorigo, Wouter
    El-Madany, Tarek S.
    Migliavacca, Mirco
    Honkanen, Marika
    Kerr, Yann H.
    Kontu, Anna
    Lemmetyinen, Juha
    Lindqvist, Hannakaisa
    Mialon, Arnaud
    Miinalainen, Tuuli
    Pique, Gaetan
    Ojasalo, Amanda
    Quegan, Shaun
    Rayner, Peter J.
    Reyes-Munoz, Pablo
    Rodriguez-Fernandez, Nemesio
    Schwank, Mike
    Verrelst, Jochem
    Zhu, Songyan
    Schuettemeyer, Dirk
    Drusch, Matthias
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 18 (07) : 2137 - 2159
  • [34] Summer Land-Atmosphere Coupling Strength over the United States: Results from the Regional Climate Model RegCM4-CLM3.5
    Mei, Rui
    Wang, Guiling
    Gu, Huanghe
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2013, 14 (03) : 946 - 962
  • [35] CM2Mc-LPJmL v1.0: biophysical coupling of a process-based dynamic vegetation model with managed land to a general circulation model
    Drueke, Markus
    von Bloh, Werner
    Petri, Stefan
    Sakschewski, Boris
    Schaphoff, Sibyll
    Forkel, Matthias
    Huiskamp, Willem
    Feulner, Georg
    Thonicke, Kirsten
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 14 (06) : 4117 - 4141
  • [36] Coupling between surface ozone and leaf area index in a chemical transport model: strength of feedback and implications for ozone air quality and vegetation health
    Zhou, Shan S.
    Tai, Amos P. K.
    Sun, Shihan
    Sadiq, Mehliyar
    Heald, Colette L.
    Geddes, Jeffrey A.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2018, 18 (19) : 14133 - 14148
  • [37] Simulation of surface energy fluxes and meteorological variables using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS): Evaluating the impact of land-atmosphere coupling on short-term forecasts
    Gomez, I.
    Caselles, V.
    Estrela, M. J.
    Sanchez, J. M.
    Rubio, E.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2018, 249 : 319 - 334
  • [38] Representing surface heterogeneity in land-atmosphere coupling in E3SMv1 single-column model over ARM SGP during summertime
    Huang, Meng
    Ma, Po-Lun
    Chaney, Nathaniel W.
    Hao, Dalei
    Bisht, Gautam
    Fowler, Megan D.
    Larson, Vincent E.
    Leung, L. Ruby
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (16) : 6371 - 6384
  • [39] Intraseasonal versus Interannual Measures of Land-Atmosphere Coupling Strength in a Global Climate Model: GLACE-1 versus GLACE-CMIP5 Experiments in ACCESS1.3b
    Lorenz, Ruth
    Pitman, Andrew J.
    Hirsch, Annette L.
    Srbinovsky, Jhan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2015, 16 (05) : 2276 - 2295