Prediction of hepatitis E using machine learning models

被引:22
|
作者
Guo, Yanhui [1 ]
Feng, Yi [2 ,3 ]
Qu, Fuli [1 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ,3 ]
Yan, Bingyu [2 ,3 ]
Lv, Jingjing [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Womens Univ, Sch Data & Comp Sci, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Shandong Prov Key Lab Infect Dis Control & Preven, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Acad Prevent Med, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0237750
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Accurate and reliable predictions of infectious disease can be valuable to public health organizations that plan interventions to decrease or prevent disease transmission. A great variety of models have been developed for this task. However, for different data series, the performance of these models varies. Hepatitis E, as an acute liver disease, has been a major public health problem. Which model is more appropriate for predicting the incidence of hepatitis E? In this paper, three different methods are used and the performance of the three methods is compared. Methods Autoregressive integrated moving average(ARIMA), support vector machine(SVM) and long short-term memory(LSTM) recurrent neural network were adopted and compared. ARIMA was implemented by python with the help of statsmodels. SVM was accomplished by matlab with libSVM library. LSTM was designed by ourselves with Keras, a deep learning library. To tackle the problem of overfitting caused by limited training samples, we adopted dropout and regularization strategies in our LSTM model. Experimental data were obtained from the monthly incidence and cases number of hepatitis E from January 2005 to December 2017 in Shandong province, China. We selected data from July 2015 to December 2017 to validate the models, and the rest was taken as training set. Three metrics were applied to compare the performance of models, including root mean square error(RMSE), mean absolute percentage error(MAPE) and mean absolute error(MAE). Results By analyzing data, we tookARIMA(1, 1, 1),ARIMA(3, 1, 2) as monthly incidence prediction model and cases number prediction model, respectively. Cross-validation and grid search were used to optimize parameters of SVM. Penalty coefficientCand kernel function parametergwere set 8, 0.125 for incidence prediction, and 22, 0.01 for cases number prediction. LSTM has 4 nodes. Dropout and L2 regularization parameters were set 0.15, 0.001, respectively. By the metrics of RMSE, we obtained 0.022, 0.0204, 0.01 for incidence prediction, using ARIMA, SVM and LSTM. And we obtained 22.25, 20.0368, 11.75 for cases number prediction, using three models. For MAPE metrics, the results were 23.5%, 21.7%, 15.08%, and 23.6%, 21.44%, 13.6%, for incidence prediction and cases number prediction, respectively. For MAE metrics, the results were 0.018, 0.0167, 0.011 and 18.003, 16.5815, 9.984, for incidence prediction and cases number prediction, respectively. Conclusions Comparing ARIMA, SVM and LSTM, we found that nonlinear models(SVM, LSTM) outperform linear models(ARIMA). LSTM obtained the best performance in all three metrics of RSME, MAPE, MAE. Hence, LSTM is the most suitable for predicting hepatitis E monthly incidence and cases number.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deep learning models for hepatitis E incidence prediction leveraging meteorological factors
    Feng, Yi
    Cui, Xiya
    Lv, Jingjing
    Yan, Bingyu
    Meng, Xin
    Zhang, Li
    Guo, Yanhui
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (03):
  • [32] Using Active Learning to Develop Machine Learning Models for Reaction Yield Prediction
    Viet Johansson, Simon
    Gummesson Svensson, Hampus
    Bjerrum, Esben
    Schliep, Alexander
    Haghir Chehreghani, Morteza
    Tyrchan, Christian
    Engkvist, Ola
    [J]. MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2022, 41 (12)
  • [33] Machine learning models and bankruptcy prediction
    Barboza, Flavio
    Kimura, Herbert
    Altman, Edward
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 83 : 405 - 417
  • [34] Sales Prediction in E-Commerce Platforms Using Machine Learning
    Aljbour, Mohammed
    Avci, Isa
    [J]. FORTHCOMING NETWORKS AND SUSTAINABILITY IN THE AIOT ERA, VOL 2, FONES-AIOT 2024, 2024, 1036 : 207 - 216
  • [35] Fairness in the prediction of acute postoperative pain using machine learning models
    Davoudi, Anis
    Sajdeya, Ruba
    Ison, Ron
    Hagen, Jennifer
    Rashidi, Parisa
    Price, Catherine C.
    Tighe, Patrick J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 4
  • [36] Prediction of baking quality using machine learning based intelligent models
    Isleroglu, Hilal
    Beyhan, Selami
    [J]. HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2020, 56 (07) : 2045 - 2055
  • [37] Estimation and Prediction of the Polymers' Physical Characteristics Using the Machine Learning Models
    Malashin, Ivan Pavlovich
    Tynchenko, Vadim Sergeevich
    Nelyub, Vladimir Aleksandrovich
    Borodulin, Aleksei Sergeevich
    Gantimurov, Andrei Pavlovich
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [38] Frost prediction using machine learning and deep neural network models
    Talsma, Carl J.
    Solander, Kurt C.
    Mudunuru, Maruti K.
    Crawford, Brandon
    Powell, Michelle R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 5
  • [39] Unboxing machine learning models for concrete strength prediction using XAI
    Sara Elhishi
    Asmaa Mohammed Elashry
    Sara El-Metwally
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [40] Susceptibility Prediction of Groundwater Hardness Using Ensemble Machine Learning Models
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    Hosseini, Farzaneh Sajedi
    Choubin, Bahram
    Abdolshahnejad, Mahsa
    Gharechaee, Hamidreza
    Lahijanzadeh, Ahmadreza
    Dineva, Adrienn A.
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (10)