Prostate cancer chemoprevention by natural agents: Clinical evidence and potential implications

被引:40
|
作者
Chhabra, Gagan [1 ]
Singh, Chandra K. [1 ]
Ndiaye, Mary Ann [1 ]
Fedorowicz, Samantha [1 ]
Molot, Arielle [1 ]
Ahmad, Nihal [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Dermatol, Madison, WI USA
[2] William S Middleton VA Med Ctr, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Chemoprevention; Natural agents; Clinical trials; GREEN-TEA-CATECHINS; BASE-LINE CHARACTERISTICS; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; VITAMIN-E; SELENIUM SUPPLEMENTATION; PREVENTION TRIAL; HIGH-RISK; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; NUTRITIONAL PREVENTION; DOUBLE-BLIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.canlet.2018.02.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in American men. Due to its long latency period, PCa is considered as an ideal cancer type for chemopreventive interventions. Chemopreventive agents include various natural or synthetic agents that prevent or delay cancer development, progression and/or recurrence. Pre-clinical studies suggest that many natural products and dietary agents have chemopreventive properties. However, a limited number of these agents have been tested in clinical trials, with varying success. In this review, we have discussed the available clinical studies regarding the efficacy of natural chemopreventive agents against PCa, including tea polyphenols, selenium, soy proteins, vitamins and resveratrol. We have also provided a discussion on the clinical challenges and opportunities for the potential use of chemopreventive agents against PCa. Based on available literature, it appears that the variable outcomes of the chemopreventive clinical studies necessitate a need for additional studies with more rigorous designs and methodical interpretations in order to measure the potential of the natural agents against PCa. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 18
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Natural history of prostate cancer, chemoprevention and active surveillance
    Bratt, Ola
    Schumacher, Martin C.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2011, 50 : 116 - 119
  • [22] Diet and prostate cancer: mechanisms of action and implications for chemoprevention
    Venkateswaran, Vasundara
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2010, 7 (08) : 442 - 453
  • [23] Lung cancer chemoprevention: difficulties, promise and potential agents?
    Dragnev, Konstantine
    You, Ming
    Wang, Yian
    Lubet, Ronald
    EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 2013, 22 (01) : 35 - 47
  • [24] Chemoprevention of prostate cancer through dietary agents: Progress and promise
    Syed, Deeba N.
    Khan, Naghma
    Afaq, Farrukh
    Mukhtar, Hasan
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2007, 16 (11) : 2193 - 2203
  • [25] Triterpenoids as potential agents for the chemoprevention and therapy of breast cancer
    Bishayee, Anupam
    Ahmed, Shamima
    Brankov, Nikoleta
    Perloff, Marjorie
    FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2011, 16 : 980 - 996
  • [26] CHEMOPREVENTION OF CANCER - IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY
    MICOZZI, MS
    BOONE, CW
    KELLOFF, GJ
    TANGREA, JA
    HELZLSOUER, KJ
    TAYLOR, PR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 25 (03): : 164 - 175
  • [27] Potential role of nimbolide in chemoprevention and therapy of prostate cancer
    Jing-wen ZHANG
    Muthu K.SHANMUGAM
    Amudha DEIVASIGAMANI
    Alan Prem KUMAR
    Kam Man HUI
    Gautam SETHI
    中国药理学与毒理学杂志, 2015, 29(S1) (S1) : 78 - 79
  • [28] Dutasteride effects on genes associated with prostate cancer progression: Implications for prostate cancer chemoprevention
    Geng, L.
    Mostaghel, E.
    Coleman, R.
    Neilson, P.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 56 (01) : 225 - 225
  • [29] Prostate cancer chemoprevention: Models, limitations and potential (Review)
    Gupta, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 25 (04) : 1133 - 1148
  • [30] Angiogenesis as a potential biomarker in prostate cancer chemoprevention trials
    Ali, IU
    Senger, DR
    Smith, LEH
    UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (4A) : 143 - 147