Consensus, Polarization and Clustering of Opinions in Social Networks

被引:96
|
作者
Li, Lin [1 ]
Scaglione, Anna [1 ]
Swami, Ananthram [2 ]
Zhao, Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] USA, Res Lab, Adelphi, MD 20783 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
opinion dynamics; continuous opinions; opinion clusters; consensus; polarization; opinion formation; social networks; opinion diffusion; information aggregation; network learning; non-Bayesian models;
D O I
10.1109/JSAC.2013.130609
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We consider a variation of the Deffuant-Weisbuch model introduced by Deffuant et al. in 2000, to provide new analytical insights on the opinion dynamics in a social group. We model the trust that may exist between like-minded agents through a trust function, which is a discontinuous (hard-interaction) non-increasing function of the opinion distance. In this model, agents exchange their opinions with their neighbors and move their opinions closer to each other if they are like-minded (that is, the distance between opinions is smaller than a threshold). We first study the dynamics of opinion formation under random interactions with a fixed rate of communication between pairs of agents. Our goal is to analyze the convergence properties of the opinion dynamics and explore the underlying characteristics that mark the phase transition from opinion polarization to consensus. Furthermore, we extend the hard-interaction model to a strategic interaction model by considering a time-varying rate of interaction. In this model, social agents themselves decide the time and energy that should be expended on interacting each of their neighbors, based on their utility functions. The aim is to understand how and under what conditions clustering patterns emerge in opinion space. Extensive simulations are provided to validate the analytical results of both the hard-interaction model and the strategic interaction model. We also offer evidence that suggests the validity of the proposed model, using the location and monthly survey data collected in the Social Evolution experiment over a period of nine months.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1083
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bayesian consensus clustering in multiplex networks
    Jovanovski, Petar
    Kocarev, Ljupco
    CHAOS, 2019, 29 (10)
  • [22] Fast consensus clustering in complex networks
    Tandon, Aditya
    Albeshri, Aiiad
    Thayananthan, Vijey
    Alhalabi, Wadee
    Fortunato, Santo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2019, 99 (04)
  • [23] Clustering social networks
    Mishra, Nina
    Schreiber, Robert
    Stanton, Isabelle
    Tarjan, Robert E.
    ALGORITHMS AND MODELS FOR THE WEB-GRAPH, 2007, 4863 : 56 - +
  • [24] Effect of algorithmic bias and network structure on coexistence, consensus, and polarization of opinions
    Peralta, Antonio F.
    Neri, Matteo
    Kertesz, Janos
    Iniguez, Gerardo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2021, 104 (04)
  • [25] Uncertainty in Social Networks: A Matter of Opinions
    Atanasov, Ilia Simeonov
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (25): : 494 - 497
  • [26] Unanimous opinions in social influence networks
    Kobayashi, J
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 25 (03): : 285 - 297
  • [27] Dynamics of Uncertain Opinions in Social Networks
    Cho, Jin-Hee
    Swami, Ananthram
    2014 IEEE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE: AFFORDABLE MISSION SUCCESS: MEETING THE CHALLENGE (MILCOM 2014), 2014, : 1627 - 1632
  • [28] Emergence of Extreme Opinions in Social Networks
    Javarone, Marco Alberto
    Galam, Serge
    Social Informatics, 2015, 8852 : 112 - 117
  • [29] RELIGION AND ITS CONNECTION TO CONSENSUS AND POLARIZATION OF OPINIONS AMONG ISRAELI YOUTH
    ZUCKERMANBARELI, C
    MEGAMOT, 1975, 22 (01): : 62 - 80
  • [30] Capricious opinions: A study of polarization of social media groups
    Kushwaha, Amit Kumar
    Kar, Arpan Kumar
    Roy, Sanjit Kumar
    Ilavarasan, P. Vigneswara
    GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2022, 39 (03)