A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science

被引:74
|
作者
Gorraiz, Juan [1 ]
Schloegl, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Lib & Arch Serv, Cent Lib Phys, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Graz Univ, Inst Informat Sci & Informat Syst, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
bibliometric analysis; comparison of databases; data reliability; impact factor; Journal Citation Reports; Scopus; Web of Science;
D O I
10.1177/0165551507086991
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Our study examines the suitability of Scopus for bibliometric analyses in comparison with the Web of Science (WOS). In particular we want to explore if the outcome of bibliometric analyses differs between Scopus and WOS and, if yes, in which aspects. Since journal indicators vary among disciplines, we analysed only journals from the subject pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences. Nonetheless, our study has also broader implications. Its major findings are: (a) Each top- 100 JCR pharmacy journal was covered by Scopus. (b) The impact factor was higher for 82 and the immediacy index greater for 78 journals in Scopus in 2005. Pharmacy journals with a high impact factor in the JCR usually have a high impact factor in Scopus. (c) Several medium impact journals could be identified in Scopus which were not reported in JCR. (d) The two databases differed in the number of articles within a tolerable margin of deviation for most journals.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 725
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis
    Caputo, Andrea
    Kargina, Mariya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING ANALYTICS, 2022, 10 (01) : 82 - 88
  • [32] Data quality and consistency in Scopus and Web of Science in their indexing of Czech Journals
    Mika, Pavel
    Szarzec, Jakub
    Sivertsen, Gunnar
    [J]. 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INDICATORS (STI 2016), 2016, : 78 - 84
  • [33] Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: the effect of poorly cited journals in oncology
    Lopez-Illescas, Carmen
    Anegon, Felix de Moya
    Moed, Henk F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2009, 35 (02) : 244 - 256
  • [34] Use of Web 2.0 tools by Ibero-American journals indexed by Web of Science and Scopus
    Neubert, Patricia da Silva
    Rodrigues, Rosangela Schwarz
    Bories Fachin, Gleisy Regina
    [J]. TRANSINFORMACAO, 2016, 28 (02): : 127 - 141
  • [35] Impact of scientific production on education for death: Bibliometric review in Scopus and Web of Science
    Martinez-Heredia, Nazaret
    Bedmar Moreno, Matias
    [J]. REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION, 2020, 82 (02): : 65 - 79
  • [36] Benchmarking research performance of the IITs using Web of Science and Scopus bibliometric databases
    Prathap, Gangan
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2013, 105 (08): : 1134 - 1138
  • [37] Mapping the literature on credit unions: a bibliometric investigation grounded in Scopus and Web of Science
    Maia, Saulo Cardoso
    de Benedicto, Gideon Carvalho
    do Prado, Jose Willer
    Robb, David Alastair
    de Almeida Bispo, Oscar Neto
    de Brito, Mozar Jose
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 120 (03) : 929 - 960
  • [38] Comparison of bibliometric indicators in journals of geography indexed in Web of Science
    Salvador Olivan, Jose Antonio
    Escolano Utrilla, Severino
    [J]. BOLETIN DE LA ASOCIACION DE GEOGRAFOS ESPANOLES, 2018, (76): : 131 - 152
  • [39] Mapping the literature on credit unions: a bibliometric investigation grounded in Scopus and Web of Science
    Saulo Cardoso Maia
    Gideon Carvalho de Benedicto
    José Willer do Prado
    David Alastair Robb
    Oscar Neto de Almeida Bispo
    Mozar José de Brito
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120 : 929 - 960
  • [40] Methods employed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases to effect changes in the ranking of the journals
    Bharathi, D. Gnana
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2013, 105 (03): : 300 - 308