A prospective comparative study of clinical and functional outcomes between anatomic double bundle and single bundle hamstring grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:17
|
作者
Morey, Vivek M. [1 ]
Nag, Hira Lal [1 ]
Chowdhury, Buddhadev [1 ]
Sankineani, Sukesh Rao [2 ,3 ]
Naranje, Sameer M. [4 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Orthopaed, New Delhi, India
[2] Malabar Orthopaed Clin, Melbourne, Vic 3181, Australia
[3] Ave Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3181, Australia
[4] Forrest City Med Ctr, Lawrence, AR 72335 USA
关键词
Anatomical double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; Single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; FOLLOW-UP; SEMITENDINOSUS TENDON; PATELLAR TENDON; KNEE; METAANALYSIS; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.699
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite a number of studies comparing postoperative stability and function after anatomic single bundle and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, it remains unclear whether double bundle reconstruction has better functional outcome than single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Purpose: To compare the subjective functional outcome as well as clinical stability in patients treated with either anatomic single bundle or anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the postoperative functional outcome and clinical stability between anatomical double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions when compared to single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Methods: We prospectively followed 40 patients out of which, 20 patients were operated for anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction and other 20 patients underwent anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction. Patient evaluation using the laxity tests and outcome scales was done preoperatively and at 12, 24 and 48 months after the surgery. Clinical stability was assessed by Lachman test, Pivot shift test and Delhi active test. Functional outcome was assessed by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Modified Cincinnati scores. Patients in both groups were evaluated at regular intervals for a minimum period of 48 months (mean 51 months, range 48-56 months). Results: For all subjective scores, double bundle group patients reported statistically significant higher scores compared to single bundle group patients. Graded stability results of the Lachman, and Pivot shift tests were significantly higher in the anatomically reconstructed double bundle patient group. Conclusion: We suggest that functional outcome and clinical stability may be better with anatomical double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as compared to anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. (C) 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 167
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Synovialization and Clinical Outcomes between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anteromedial Bundle Augmentation and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Ahn, Gil Yeong
    Hwang, Sung Hyun
    Kang, Seo Won
    Song, Jun Hyeok
    Park, Jee Soo
    Lee, Yeong Hyeon
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2025,
  • [22] Comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Moghtadaei, M.
    Farahini, H.
    Jabalameli, M.
    Zangi, M.
    Siavashi, B.
    Bagherifard, A.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2012, 63 (03) : 201 - 207
  • [23] Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Gil Yeong Ahn
    Tae Hun Lee
    Kyung Jin Lee
    Sangwon Woo
    Knee Surgery & Related Research, 32
  • [24] Comparison of clinical outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluations between anterior cruciate ligament anteromedial bundle augmentation and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Ahn, Gil Yeong
    Lee, Tae Hun
    Lee, Kyung Jin
    Woo, Sangwon
    KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [25] Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in single bundle technique
    Petersen, W.
    Forkel, P.
    Achtnich, A.
    Metzlaff, S.
    Zantop, T.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2013, 25 (02): : 185 - 201
  • [26] Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    van Eck, Carola F.
    Romanowski, James R.
    Fu, Freddie H.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (09): : 943 - 946
  • [27] Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Long-Term Functional Outcomes
    Anandan, Vicknesh
    Goh, Teik Chiang
    Zamri, Kamarul Syariza
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [28] Clinical evaluation of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective, randomized and controlled study
    Wang Jian-quan
    Ao Ying-fang
    Yu Chang-long
    Liu Ping
    Xu Yan
    Chen Lin-xin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 122 (06) : 706 - 711
  • [29] Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double bundle versus single bundle: experimental study
    Mota e Albuquerque, Roberto F.
    Sasaki, Sandra Umeda
    Amatuzzi, Marco Martins
    Angelini, Fabio Janson
    CLINICS, 2007, 62 (03) : 335 - 344
  • [30] Prospective randomized comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yan Xu
    Ying-fang Ao
    Jian-quan Wang
    Guo-qing Cui
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 308 - 316