Investigating a multigene prognostic assay based on significant pathways for Luminal A breast cancer through gene expression profile analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Haiyan [1 ]
Yang, Mei [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaolan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Changzhou Peoples Hosp 2, Dept Breast Surg, 68 Gehu Rd, Changzhou 213000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Luminal A breast cancer; differentially expressed genes; significant pathways; multigene prognostic assay; DISTANT RECURRENCE; RISK; METASTASIS; PREDICTION; DOCETAXEL; SIGNATURE; TAMOXIFEN; PATTERNS; SUBTYPE; SCORE;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2018.7940
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The present study aimed to investigate potential recurrence-risk biomarkers based on significant pathways for Luminal A breast cancer through gene expression profile analysis. Initially, the gene expression profiles of Luminal A breast cancer patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using a Limma package and the hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted for the DEGs. In addition, the functional pathways were screened using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses and rank ratio calculation. The multigene prognostic assay was exploited based on the statistically significant pathways and its prognostic function was tested using train set and verified using the gene expression data and survival data of Luminal A breast cancer patients downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus. A total of 300 DEGs were identified between good and poor outcome groups, including 176 upregulated genes and 124 downregulated genes. The DEGs may be used to effectively distinguish Luminal A samples with different prognoses verified by hierarchical clustering analysis. There were 9 pathways screened as significant pathways and a total of 18 DEGs involved in these 9 pathways were identified as prognostic biomarkers. According to the survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve, the obtained 18-gene prognostic assay exhibited good prognostic function with high sensitivity and specificity to both the train and test samples. In conclusion the 18-gene prognostic assay including the key genes, transcription factor 7-like 2, anterior parietal cortex and lymphocyte enhancer factor-1 may provide a new method for predicting outcomes and may be conducive to the promotion of precision medicine for Luminal A breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:5027 / 5033
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-level gene expression signatures provide significant prognostic information in metastatic breast cancer patients
    Tobin, N. P.
    Lundberg, A.
    Lindstrom, L. S.
    Harrell, J. C.
    Brage, S. Egyhazi
    Stolt, M. Frostvik
    Einbeigi, Z.
    Loman, N.
    Malmberg, M.
    Perou, C. M.
    Bergh, J.
    Hatschek, T.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [32] Intratumor Heterogeneity Affects Gene Expression Profile Test Prognostic Risk Stratification in Early Breast Cancer
    Gyanchandani, Rekha
    Lin, Yan
    Lin, Hui-Min
    Cooper, Kristine
    Normolle, Daniel P.
    Brufsky, Adam
    Fastuca, Michael
    Crosson, Whitney
    Oesterreich, Steffi
    Davidson, Nancy E.
    Bhargava, Rohit
    Dabbs, David J.
    Lee, Adrian V.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (21) : 5362 - 5369
  • [33] Gene expression profile analysis of pancreatic cancer based on microarray data
    Long, Jin
    Liu, Zhe
    Wu, Xingda
    Xu, Yuanhong
    Ge, Chunlin
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2016, 13 (05) : 3913 - 3919
  • [34] Functional Analysis of Prognostic Gene Expression Network Genes in Metastatic Breast Cancer Models
    Geiger, Thomas R.
    Ngoc-Han Ha
    Faraji, Farhoud
    Michael, Helen T.
    Rodriguez, Loren
    Walker, Renard C.
    Green, Jeffery E.
    Simpson, R. Mark
    Hunter, Kent W.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [35] Biological and functional analysis of statistically significant pathways deregulated in colon cancer by using gene expression profiles
    Distaso, Angela
    Abatangelo, Luca
    Maglietta, Rosalia
    Creanza, Teresa Maria
    Piepoli, Ada
    Carella, Massimo
    D'Addabbo, Annarita
    Ancona, Nicola
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 4 (06): : 368 - 378
  • [36] Prognostic Genes of Breast Cancer Identified by Gene Co-expression Network Analysis
    Tang, Jianing
    Kong, Deguang
    Cui, Qiuxia
    Wang, Kun
    Zhang, Dan
    Gong, Yan
    Wu, Gaosong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [37] Prognostic genes of breast cancer revealed by gene co-expression network analysis
    Shi, Huijie
    Zhang, Lei
    Qu, Yanjun
    Hou, Lifang
    Wang, Ling
    Zheng, Min
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 14 (04) : 4535 - 4542
  • [38] Gene expression profile analysis of human breast cancer: using cDNA microarrys.
    Lee, YH
    Kim, HS
    Jung, JH
    Park, HY
    Jung, EK
    Kim, MK
    Kim, JC
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 82 : S165 - S165
  • [39] Identification of potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for breast cancer based on gene expression omnibus
    Zhang, Xiong
    Mi, Zhi-Hui
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2023, 11 (27) : 6344 - 6362
  • [40] Prognostic value of FGFR2 in ER-positive breast cancer is influenced by the profile of stromal gene expression: an in silico analysis based on TCGA data
    Solek, Julia M.
    Nowicka, Zuzanna
    Fendler, Wojciech
    Sadej, Rafal
    Romanska, Hanna
    Braun, Marcin
    WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 28 (04): : 341 - 349