Is sustainability achievable? Exploring the limits of sustainability with model systems

被引:22
|
作者
Shastri, Yogendra [1 ]
Diwekar, Urmila [1 ]
Cabezas, Heriberto [2 ]
Williamson, James [2 ]
机构
[1] CUSTOM, Vishwamitra Res Inst, Clarendon Hills, IL 60514 USA
[2] US EPA, Sustainable Environm Branch, Off Res & Dev, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es800661x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Successful implementation of sustainability ideas in ecosystem management requires a basic understanding of the often nonlinear and nonintuitive relationships among different dimensions of sustainability, particularly the system-wide implications of human actions. This basic understanding further includes a sense of the time scale of possible future events and the limits of what is and is not likely to be possible. With this understanding, systematic approaches can then be used to develop policy guidelines for the system. This article presents an illustration of these ideas by analyzing an integrated ecological-economic-social model, which comprises various ecological (natural) and domesticated compartments representing species along with a macroeconomic price setting model. The stable and qualitatively realistic model is used to analyze different relevant scenarios. Apart from highlighting complex relationships within the system, it identifies potentially unsustainable future developments such as increased human per capita consumption rates. Dynamic optimization is then used to develop time-de pendent policy guidelines for the unsustainable scenarios using objective functions that aim to minimize fluctuations in the system's Fisher information. The results can help to identify effective policy parameters and highlight the tradeoff between natural and domesticated compartments while managing such integrated systems. The results should also qualitatively guide further investigations in the area of system level studies and policy development.
引用
收藏
页码:6710 / 6716
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring the Effects of Sustainability on Accounting Information Systems: The Role of SBSC
    Corsi, Katia
    Arru, Brunella
    NETWORK, SMART AND OPEN: THREE KEYWORDS FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS INNOVATION, 2018, 24 : 235 - 255
  • [32] Nonlinear model and sustainability of social security systems
    Ge Zhaoqiang
    Zhang Sifeng
    DYNAMICS OF CONTINUOUS DISCRETE AND IMPULSIVE SYSTEMS-SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 13 : 284 - 286
  • [33] Measurement of sustainability of model arable farming systems
    Mísa, P
    Kren, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 2001, 47 (07): : 301 - 308
  • [34] A systems view of sustainability: The triple value model
    Fiksel, Joseph
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 2 : 138 - 141
  • [35] A multidimensional holistic sustainability model for production systems
    Bernhard, Olivia
    Brandstetter, Johannes
    Zaeh, Michael F.
    Production and Manufacturing Research, 2024, 12 (01):
  • [36] A conceptual model for exploring the relationship between sustainability and project success
    Silvius, A. J. Gilbert
    Schipper, Ron
    CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS/INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT/CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CENTERIS/PROJMAN / HCIST 2015, 2015, 64 : 334 - 342
  • [37] Sustainable business model innovation: exploring evidences in sustainability reporting
    Morioka, Sandra Naomi
    Evans, Steve
    de Carvalho, Marly Monteiro
    13TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - DECOUPLING GROWTH FROM RESOURCE USE, 2016, 40 : 659 - 667
  • [38] Assessing the Limits of Sustainability for the Delepine Reaction
    Jordan, Andrew
    Huang, Shanjun
    Sneddon, Helen F.
    Nortcliffe, Andrew
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (34) : 12746 - 12754
  • [39] Limits of Design for Recycling and “Sustainability”: A Review
    M. A. Reuter
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2011, 2 : 183 - 208
  • [40] The Limits of Sustainability and Opportunities in the Social Economy
    Poole, Dennis L.
    Kumar, Durgesh
    SOCIAL WORK, 2012, 57 (01) : 95 - 99