Wind estimation and prediction for adaptive optics control systems

被引:4
|
作者
Johnson, Luke C. [1 ]
Gavel, Donald T. [1 ]
Reinig, Marc [1 ]
Wiberg, Donald M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Ctr Adapt Opt, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
来源
ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS, PTS 1-3 | 2008年 / 7015卷
关键词
Astronomical Instrumentation;
D O I
10.1117/12.790143
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Performance of adaptive optics (AO) systems is limited by the tradeoff between photon noise at the wavefront sensor and temporal error from the duty cycle of the controller. Optimal control studies have shown that this temporal error can be reduced by predicting the turbulence evolution during the control cycle. We formulate a wind model that divides the wind into two components: a quasi-static layer and a wind-driven frozen-flow layer. Using this internal wind model, we design a computationally efficient controller that is able to estimate and predict the dynamics of a single windblown layer and Simulate this controller using on-sky data from the Palomar Adaptive Optics system. We also present results from a laboratory implementation of multi-conjugate AO (MCAO) with multi-layer wind estimation in conjunction with tomographic reconstruction. The tomography engine breaks the atmosphere into discrete layers, each with its own wind estimator. The resulting MCAO control algorithm is able to track and predict the motion of multiple wind layers with wind estimates that update at every controller cycle. Once the wind velocities of each layer are known, the deformable mirror update speed is no longer limited by the wavefront sensor exposure time so it is possible to send multiple correction updates to the deformable mirror each control cycle in order to dynamically track wind layers across the telescope aperture. The result is better dynamics in the feedback control system that enables higher closed-loop bandwidth for a given wavefront sensor frame rate.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of time-variant turbulence behavior on prediction for adaptive optics systems
    van Kooten, Maaike
    Doelman, Niek
    Kenworthy, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2019, 36 (05) : 731 - 740
  • [42] Robustness of prediction for extreme adaptive optics systems under various observing conditions An analysis using VLT/SPHERE adaptive optics data
    van Kooten, M. A. M.
    Doelman, N.
    Kenworthy, M.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2020, 636
  • [43] An Integrated Identification and Predictive Control Strategy for High Wind Velocity Adaptive Optics Applications
    Cranney, Jesse
    De Dona, Jose
    Korkiakoski, Visa
    Rigaut, Francois
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS VI, 2018, 10703
  • [44] Control system design issues for retinal imaging adaptive optics systems
    Ficocelli, M
    Ben Amara, F
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL APPLICATIONS (CCA), VOLS 1AND 2, 2005, : 743 - 748
  • [45] ADAPTIVE OPTICS FEEDBACK CONTROL
    Folcher, J-P
    Carbillet, M.
    Ferrari, A.
    Abelli, A.
    NEW CONCEPTS IN IMAGING: OPTICAL AND STATISTICAL MODELS, 2013, 59 : 93 - 130
  • [46] PI-shaped LQG control design for adaptive optics systems
    Mocci, Jacopo
    Quintavalla, Martino
    Chiuso, Alessandro
    Bonora, Stefano
    Muradore, Riccardo
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2020, 102
  • [47] Model Predictive Control of Multi-Mirror Adaptive Optics Systems
    Glueck, Martin
    Pott, Joerg-Uwe
    Sawodny, Oliver
    2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS (CCTA), 2018, : 909 - 914
  • [48] ADAPTIVE OPTICS - SHAPE CONTROL OF AN ADAPTIVE MIRROR
    TRUCHI, C
    LECTURE NOTES IN CONTROL AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1990, 147 : 28 - 45
  • [49] Adaptive Control for the IOS Adaptive Optics System
    Tesch, Jonathan
    Tuan Truong
    Roberts, Lewis C., Jr.
    Gibson, Steve
    UNCONVENTIONAL AND INDIRECT IMAGING, IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION, AND WAVEFRONT SENSING 2019, 2019, 11135
  • [50] Teaching Optics and Systems Engineering With Adaptive Optics Workbenches
    Harrington, D. M.
    Ammons, M.
    Hunter, Lisa
    Max, Claire
    Hoffmann, Mark
    Pitts, Mark
    Armstrong, J. D.
    LEARNING FROM INQUIRY IN PRACTICE, 2010, 436 : 306 - +