Calibrating the Classical Hardness of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

被引:7
|
作者
Dupont, Maxime [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Didier, Nicolas [3 ]
Hodson, Mark J. [3 ]
Moore, Joel E. [1 ,2 ]
Reagor, Matthew J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Phys, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Mat Sci Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Rigetti Comp, 775 Heinz Ave, Berkeley, CA 94710 USA
来源
PRX QUANTUM | 2022年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
COMPUTATIONAL ADVANTAGE; SUPREMACY; CUT;
D O I
10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.040339
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The trading of fidelity for scale enables approximate classical simulators such as matrix product states (MPSs) to run quantum circuits beyond exact methods. A control parameter, the so-called bond dimension chi for MPSs, governs the allocated computational resources and the output fidelity. Here, we characterize the fidelity for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm by the expectation value of the cost func-tion that it seeks to minimize and find that it follows a scaling law F(ln chi IN), where N is the number of qubits. With ln chi amounting to the entanglement that a MPS can encode, we show that the relevant variable for investigating the fidelity is the entanglement per qubit. Importantly, our results calibrate the classical computational power required to achieve the desired fidelity and benchmark the performance of quantum hardware in a realistic setup. For instance, we quantify the hardness of performing better classically than a noisy superconducting quantum processor by readily matching its output to the scaling function. Moreover, we relate the global fidelity to that of individual operations and establish its relation-ship with chi and N. We sharpen the requirements for noisy quantum computers to outperform classical techniques at running a quantum optimization algorithm in speed, size, and fidelity.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Compressed sensing enhanced by a quantum approximate optimization algorithm
    Chevalier, Baptiste
    Roga, Wojciech
    Takeoka, Masahiro
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2024, 110 (06)
  • [42] Multi-angle quantum approximate optimization algorithm
    Herrman, Rebekah
    Lotshaw, Phillip C.
    Ostrowski, James
    Humble, Travis S.
    Siopsis, George
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [43] A review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its variants
    Blekos, Kostas
    Brand, Dean
    Ceschini, Andrea
    Chou, Chiao-Hui
    Li, Rui-Hao
    Pandya, Komal
    Summer, Alessandro
    PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2024, 1068 : 1 - 66
  • [44] Quantum approximate optimization algorithm applied to the binary perceptron
    Torta, Pietro
    Mbeng, Glen B.
    Baldassi, Carlo
    Zecchina, Riccardo
    Santoro, Giuseppe E.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2023, 107 (09)
  • [45] Quantum approximate optimization algorithm with adaptive bias fields
    Yu, Yunlong
    Cao, Chenfeng
    Dewey, Carter
    Wang, Xiang-Bin
    Shannon, Nic
    Joynt, Robert
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2022, 4 (02):
  • [46] Quantum approximate optimization algorithm in non-Markovian quantum systems
    Yue, Bo
    Xue, Shibei
    Pan, Yu
    Jiang, Min
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2023, 98 (10)
  • [47] Sampling frequency thresholds for the quantum advantage of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm
    Danylo Lykov
    Jonathan Wurtz
    Cody Poole
    Mark Saffman
    Tom Noel
    Yuri Alexeev
    npj Quantum Information, 9
  • [48] From the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to a Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz
    Hadfield, Stuart
    Wang, Zhihui
    O'Gorman, Bryan
    Rieffel, Eleanor G.
    Venturelli, Davide
    Biswas, Rupak
    ALGORITHMS, 2019, 12 (02)
  • [49] Sampling frequency thresholds for the quantum advantage of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm
    Lykov, Danylo
    Wurtz, Jonathan
    Poole, Cody
    Saffman, Mark
    Noel, Tom
    Alexeev, Yuri
    NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [50] Optimal Protocols in Quantum Annealing and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Problems
    Brady, Lucas T.
    Baldwin, Christopher L.
    Bapat, Aniruddha
    Kharkov, Yaroslav
    Gorshkov, Alexey, V
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2021, 126 (07)