Calibrating the Classical Hardness of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

被引:7
|
作者
Dupont, Maxime [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Didier, Nicolas [3 ]
Hodson, Mark J. [3 ]
Moore, Joel E. [1 ,2 ]
Reagor, Matthew J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Phys, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Mat Sci Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Rigetti Comp, 775 Heinz Ave, Berkeley, CA 94710 USA
来源
PRX QUANTUM | 2022年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
COMPUTATIONAL ADVANTAGE; SUPREMACY; CUT;
D O I
10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.040339
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The trading of fidelity for scale enables approximate classical simulators such as matrix product states (MPSs) to run quantum circuits beyond exact methods. A control parameter, the so-called bond dimension chi for MPSs, governs the allocated computational resources and the output fidelity. Here, we characterize the fidelity for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm by the expectation value of the cost func-tion that it seeks to minimize and find that it follows a scaling law F(ln chi IN), where N is the number of qubits. With ln chi amounting to the entanglement that a MPS can encode, we show that the relevant variable for investigating the fidelity is the entanglement per qubit. Importantly, our results calibrate the classical computational power required to achieve the desired fidelity and benchmark the performance of quantum hardware in a realistic setup. For instance, we quantify the hardness of performing better classically than a noisy superconducting quantum processor by readily matching its output to the scaling function. Moreover, we relate the global fidelity to that of individual operations and establish its relation-ship with chi and N. We sharpen the requirements for noisy quantum computers to outperform classical techniques at running a quantum optimization algorithm in speed, size, and fidelity.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantum dropout: On and over the hardness of quantum approximate optimization algorithm
    Wang, Zhenduo
    Zheng, Pei-Lin
    Wu, Biao
    Zhang, Yi
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2023, 5 (02):
  • [2] Classical symmetries and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
    Shaydulin, Ruslan
    Hadfield, Stuart
    Hogg, Tad
    Safro, Ilya
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2021, 20 (11)
  • [3] Classical symmetries and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
    Ruslan Shaydulin
    Stuart Hadfield
    Tad Hogg
    Ilya Safro
    Quantum Information Processing, 2021, 20
  • [4] Classical variational simulation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
    Medvidovic, Matija
    Carleo, Giuseppe
    NPJ QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [5] Classical variational simulation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
    Matija Medvidović
    Giuseppe Carleo
    npj Quantum Information, 7
  • [6] Genetic algorithms as classical optimizer for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
    Acampora, Giovanni
    Chiatto, Angela
    Vitiello, Autilia
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 142
  • [7] A study of the performance of classical minimizers in the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
    Fernandez-Pendas, Mario
    Combarro, Elias F.
    Vallecorsa, Sofia
    Ranilla, Jose
    Rua, Ignacio F.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2022, 404
  • [8] Beating classical heuristics for the binary paint shop problem with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm
    Streif, Michael
    Yarkoni, Sheir
    Skolik, Andrea
    Neukart, Florian
    Leib, Martin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2021, 104 (01)
  • [9] Multiscale quantum approximate optimization algorithm
    Zou, Ping
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2025, 111 (01)
  • [10] Shortcuts to the quantum approximate optimization algorithm
    Chai, Yahui
    Han, Yong-Jian
    Wu, Yu-Chun
    Li, Ye
    Dou, Menghan
    Guo, Guo-Ping
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2022, 105 (04)