Segregating early physical and syntactic processes in auditory sentence comprehension

被引:20
|
作者
Hahne, A
Schröger, E
Friederici, AD
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Cognit Neurosci, D-04303 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
auditory event-related potentials; language; mismatch negativity; syntax;
D O I
10.1097/00001756-200203040-00012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Auditory language comprehension involves physical as well as syntactic processing. The present study examined whether early physical and syntactic processes in spoken sentence comprehension can be segregated using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). In the physical manipulation condition, the terminal word of the sentence was presented either from the same or from a different location to the preceding sentence fragment. in the syntactic manipulation condition, the terminal word was either a syntactically correct continuation of the preceding sentence fragment or violated syntactic constraints. These two factors were completely crossed. Physical deviances elicited the mismatch negativity (MMN) and syntactic deviances the early syntax-related negativity, both deviance-related components of the ERP. Sentences which violated physical as well as syntactic constraints elicited a negativity which was larger than that elicited by only a physical or only a syntactic deviance. The elicitation of the MMN in connected speech demonstrates that this component can be used as a probe for auditory change-detection even in ecologically highly valid situations. The increase of deviance-related effects with double deviants suggests that the early physical and syntactic processing systems act, to a high degree, in parallel and independently of each other. NeuroReport 13:305-309 (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 309
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adaptation to syntactic structures in native and nonnative sentence comprehension
    Kaan, Edith
    Futch, Corinne
    Fernandez Fuertes, Raquel
    Mujcinovic, Sonja
    Alvarez De la Fuente, Esther
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2019, 40 (01) : 3 - 27
  • [22] SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION, EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN
    DEVINCENZI, M
    [J]. FOLIA LINGUISTICA, 1994, 28 (1-2) : 139 - 173
  • [23] Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence of Syntactic Priming in Sentence Comprehension
    Tooley, Kristen M.
    Traxler, Matthew J.
    Swaab, Tamara Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2009, 35 (01) : 19 - 45
  • [24] Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: An ERP study
    Zhou, Xiaolin
    Jiang, Xiaoming
    Ye, Zheng
    Zhang, Yaxu
    Lou, Kaiyang
    Zhan, Weidong
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (06) : 1551 - 1562
  • [25] CHILDRENS COMPREHENSION OF BETWEEN-SENTENCE AND WITHIN-SENTENCE SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES
    BORMUTH, JR
    MANNING, J
    CARR, J
    PEARSON, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 61 (05) : 349 - &
  • [26] AUDITORY COMPREHENSION AND AGING - DECLINE IN SYNTACTIC PROCESSING
    OBLER, LK
    FEIN, D
    NICHOLAS, M
    ALBERT, ML
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 1991, 12 (04) : 433 - 452
  • [27] Syntactic complexity differentially affects auditory sentence comprehension performance for individuals with age-related hearing loss
    Shin, Junyoung
    Noh, Shinhee
    Park, Jimin
    Sung, Jee Eun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [28] The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension:: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes
    Friederici, AD
    Rüschemeyer, SA
    Hahne, A
    Fiebach, CJ
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2003, 13 (02) : 170 - 177
  • [29] PET studies of syntactic processing with auditory sentence presentation
    Caplan, D
    Alpert, N
    Waters, G
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 1999, 9 (03) : 343 - 351
  • [30] INTERACTIVE PROCESSES IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION AND RECOGNITION
    MASSON, MEJ
    SALA, LS
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 10 (02) : 244 - 270