Management Platforms and Protocols for Internet of Things: A Survey

被引:29
|
作者
Silva, Jonathan de C. [1 ]
Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Al-Muhtadi, Jalal [3 ,4 ]
Rabelo, Ricardo A. L. [5 ]
Furtado, Vasco [6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Telecommun Inatel, BR-37540000 Santa Rita Do Sapucai, MG, Brazil
[2] Inst Telecomunicacoes, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Riyadh 11653, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Saud Univ, Ctr Excellence Informat Assurance, Riyadh 11653, Saudi Arabia
[5] Fed Univ Piaui UFPI, Grad Program Comp Sci PPGCC, DC, Minist Petronio Portela Campus, BR-64049550 Teresina, Piaui, Brazil
[6] Univ Fortaleza UNIFOR, Grad Program Appl Informat, BR-60811905 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
关键词
Internet of Things; IoT management; network management; device management; management platform; protocols; ARCHITECTURE; MECHANISM; DEVICES; WEB;
D O I
10.3390/s19030676
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Internet of Things (IoT) management systems require scalability, standardized communication, and context-awareness to achieve the management of connected devices with security and accuracy in real environments. Interoperability and heterogeneity between hardware and application layers are also critical issues. To attend to the network requirements and different functionalities, a dynamic and context-sensitive configuration management system is required. Thus, reference architectures (RAs) represent a basic architecture and the definition of key characteristics for the construction of IoT environments. Therefore, choosing the best technologies of the IoT management platforms and protocols through comparison and evaluation is a hard task, since they are difficult to compare due to their lack of standardization. However, in the literature, there are no management platforms focused on addressing all IoT issues. For this purpose, this paper surveys the available policies and solutions for IoT Network Management and devices. Among the available technologies, an evaluation was performed using features such as heterogeneity, scalability, supported technologies, and security. Based on this evaluation, the most promising technologies were chosen for a detailed performance evaluation study (through simulation and deployment in real environments). In terms of contributions, these protocols and platforms were studied in detail, the main features of each approach are highlighted and discussed, open research issues are identified as well as the lessons learned on the topic.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A survey on,routing protocols supported by the Contiki Internet of things operating system
    Bin Zikria, Yousaf
    Afzal, Muhammad Khalil
    Ishmanov, Farruh
    Kim, Sung Won
    Yu, Heejung
    [J]. FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2018, 82 : 200 - 219
  • [42] Security for the Internet of Things: A Survey of Existing Protocols and Open Research Issues
    Granjal, Jorge
    Monteiro, Edmundo
    Silva, Jorge Sa
    [J]. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2015, 17 (03): : 1294 - 1312
  • [43] A Survey and Comparison of Publish/Subscribe Protocols for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)
    Nast, Michael
    Raddatz, Hannes
    Rother, Benjamin
    Golatowski, Frank
    Timmermann, Dirk
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE INTERNET OF THINGS 2022, IOT 2022, 2022, : 193 - 200
  • [44] Comprehensive survey on data dissemination protocols for efficient reprogramming in Internet of Things
    Shanmugapriya, Rathinam
    Santhosh Kumar, Sripathi Venkata Naga
    [J]. CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2022, 34 (26):
  • [45] Big Spatial Data Management for the Internet of Things: A Survey
    Al Jawarneh, Isam Mashhour
    Bellavista, Paolo
    Corradi, Antonio
    Foschini, Luca
    Montanari, Rebecca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (04) : 990 - 1035
  • [46] Smart Waste Management using Internet of Things: A Survey
    Pallavi, K. N.
    Kumar, Ravi, V
    Chaithra, B. M.
    [J]. 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON I-SMAC (IOT IN SOCIAL, MOBILE, ANALYTICS AND CLOUD) (I-SMAC), 2017, : 60 - 64
  • [47] Big Spatial Data Management for the Internet of Things: A Survey
    Isam Mashhour Al Jawarneh
    Paolo Bellavista
    Antonio Corradi
    Luca Foschini
    Rebecca Montanari
    [J]. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 2020, 28 : 990 - 1035
  • [48] Understanding the trustworthiness management in the social Internet of Things: A survey
    Sagar, Subhash
    Mahmood, Adnan
    Sheng, Quan Z.
    Zhang, Wei Emma
    Zhang, Yang
    Pabani, Jitander Kumar
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2024, 251
  • [49] Survey on Data Management for Healthcare using Internet of Things
    Chaudhari, Dipalee A.
    Umamaheswari, E.
    [J]. 2018 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING COMMUNICATION CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (ICCUBEA), 2018,
  • [50] Industrial Internet of Things for Safety Management Applications: A Survey
    Misra, Sudip
    Roy, Chandana
    Sauter, Thilo
    Mukherjee, Anandarup
    Maiti, Jhareswar
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 83415 - 83439