Social Dominance in Context and in Individuals: Contextual Moderation of Robust Effects of Social Dominance Orientation in 15 Languages and 20 Countries

被引:180
|
作者
Pratto, Felicia [1 ]
Cidam, Atilla [1 ]
Stewart, Andrew L. [1 ]
Zeineddine, Fouad Bou [1 ]
Aranda, Maria [2 ]
Aiello, Antonio [3 ]
Chryssochoou, Xenia [4 ]
Cichocka, Aleksandra [5 ]
Cohrs, J. Christopher [6 ]
Durrheim, Kevin [7 ]
Eicher, Veronique [8 ]
Foels, Rob [1 ]
Gorska, Paulina [5 ]
Lee, I-Ching [9 ]
Licata, Laurent [10 ]
Liu, James H. [12 ]
Li, Liu [11 ]
Meyer, Ines [13 ]
Morselli, Davide [8 ]
Muldoon, Orla [14 ]
Muluk, Hamdi [15 ]
Papastamou, Stamos [4 ]
Petrovic, Igor
Petrovic, Nebojsa [16 ]
Prodromitis, Gerasimos [4 ]
Prati, Francesca [17 ]
Rubini, Monica [14 ]
Saab, Rim [19 ]
van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien [18 ]
Sweetman, Joseph [19 ]
Zheng, Wenwen [11 ]
Henkel, Kristen E. [20 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Jaen, Jaen, Spain
[3] Univ Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[4] Pante Univ Social & Polit Sci, Athens, Greece
[5] Univ Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
[6] Queens Univ, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[7] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[8] Univ Lausanne, NCCR LIVES, Lausanne, Switzerland
[9] Natl Chengchi Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
[10] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
[11] Beijing Normal Univ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[12] Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
[13] Univ Cape Town, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[14] Univ Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
[15] Univ Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
[16] Univ Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
[17] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
[18] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[19] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff CF10 3AX, S Glam, Wales
[20] Cent Connecticut State Univ, New Britain, CT 06050 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
social dominance orientation; cross-cultural; prejudice; social attitudes; ATTITUDES; INEQUALITY; ENGLISH; VERSION; GENDER;
D O I
10.1177/1948550612473663
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We tested the internal reliability and predictive validity of a new 4-item Short Social Dominance Orientation (SSDO) scale among adults in 20 countries, using 15 languages (N = 2,130). Low scores indicate preferring group inclusion and equality to dominance. As expected, cross-nationally, the lower people were on SSDO, the more they endorsed more women in leadership positions, protecting minorities, and aid to the poor. Multilevel moderation models showed that each effect was stronger in nations where a relevant kind of group power differentiation was more salient. Distributions of SSDO were positively skewed, despite use of an extended response scale; results show rejecting group hierarchy is normative. The short scale is effective. Challenges regarding translations, use of short scales, and intersections between individual and collective levels in social dominance theory are discussed.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:587 / 599
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条