Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Case Control Study

被引:4
|
作者
van den Boezem, P. B. [1 ]
Kruyt, P. M. [1 ]
Cuesta, M. A. [2 ]
Sietses, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gelderse Vallei Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-6716 RP Ede, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
OPEN COLORECTAL SURGERY; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; SCAR;
D O I
10.1080/00015458.2012.11680855
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Single-incision laparoscospic surgery (SILS) is a minimally invasive technique which can be used for treatment of gallbladder disease. To evaluate our initial experience, patients treated with SILS cholecystectomy were compared with a comparable group of patients treated with a conventional four trocart technique (LC). Methods : Between May 2009 and April 2010,60 SILS cholecystectomies were performed. These patients were matched by Body Mass Index (BMI) with 60 cases of conventional LC. Results : The operative time was significantly longer in the SILS group 55 min (range, 25-126 min) compared to 49 min (range, 28-75 min) for the LC group. Excluding the first 15 SILS cases the operative time became comparable to the conventional technique, with a mean operative time of 51 min (range, 25-90 min). No patients were converted to open cholecystectomy. In the SILS group 3 patients developed a wound infection, in the conventional LC group 2. Conclusion : SILS cholecystectomy seems to be a safe and feasible procedure when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Complication rates are comparable to conventional LC. With a learning curve of around 10 to 15 procedures, operative times approach those of conventional LC.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 377
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A case-match study
    Joliat, Gaetan-Romain
    Uldry, Emilie
    Demartines, Nicolas
    Schaefer, Markus
    [J]. SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2014, 2 : 1 - 6
  • [22] Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Biebl, Matthias
    Laimer, Elisabeth
    Klaus, Alexander
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (01) : 139 - 139
  • [23] SINGLE-INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    Gupta, Nikhil
    Arora, Mohinder P.
    [J]. SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (12) : 855 - 855
  • [24] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Thompson, K.
    Spivack, A.
    Fischer, L.
    Wong, B.
    Jacobsen, G.
    Talamini, M.
    Horgan, S.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (05): : 1664 - 1664
  • [25] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    K. Thompson
    A. Spivack
    L. Fischer
    B. Wong
    G. Jacobsen
    M. Talamini
    S. Horgan
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 1664 - 1664
  • [26] Comparison of Cosmetic Outcome Between Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Objective Study
    Garg, Pankaj
    Thakur, Jai Deep
    Raina, Navin C.
    Mittal, Garima
    Garg, Mahak
    Gupta, Vikas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (02): : 127 - 130
  • [27] Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study
    Haugvik, Sven-Petter
    Rosok, Bard Ingvald
    Waage, Anne
    Mathisen, Oystein
    Edwin, Bjorn
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2013, 398 (08) : 1091 - 1096
  • [28] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using reusable conventional instruments
    El Masry, Mohamed A.
    Salah, Mohamed
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 33 (04): : 252 - 259
  • [29] Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: Conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery
    Prasad, A.
    Mukherjee, K. A.
    Kaul, S.
    Kaur, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2011, 7 (01) : 24 - 27
  • [30] Clinical outcomes of single-incision robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Lee, Sung Ryol
    Kim, Hyung Ook
    Shin, Jun Ho
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 62 (01) : 52 - 56