A comparison of strategies to recruit older patients and carers to end-of-life research in primary care

被引:14
|
作者
Hanratty, Barbara [1 ]
Lowson, Elizabeth [2 ]
Holmes, Louise [3 ]
Addington-Hall, Julia [2 ]
Arthur, Antony [4 ]
Grande, Gunn [5 ]
Payne, Sheila [6 ]
Seymour, Jane [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, Hull York Med Sch, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Fac Hlth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Publ Hlth & Policy, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Physiotherapy, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Lancaster, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient selection; Primary health care; Caregivers; Palliative care; Aged; Recruitment to research; End-of-life care research; Research in primary care; PALLIATIVE CARE; CANCER; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-12-342
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Older adults receive most of their end-of-life care in the community, but there are few published data to guide researchers on recruitment to studies in primary care. The aim of this study was to compare recruitment of patients and bereaved carers from general practices in areas with different research network support, and identify challenges in obtaining samples representative of those in need of end-of-life care. Methods: Comparative analysis of recruitment from general practices to two face-to-face interview studies concerned with 1) carers' perceptions of transitions between settings for decedents aged over 75 years and 2) the experiences of older patients living with cancer at the end-of-life. Results: 33 (15% of invitees) patients and 118 (25%) carers were interviewed. Carers from disadvantaged areas were under-represented. Recruitment was higher when researchers, rather than research network staff, were in direct contact with general practices. Most practices recruited no more than one carer, despite a seven fold difference in the number of registered patients. The proportion identified as eligible for patient interviews varied by a factor of 38 between practices. Forty-four Primary Care Trusts granted approval to interview carers; two refused. One gave no reason; a second did not believe that general practitioners would be able to identify carers. Conclusion: Obtaining a representative sample of patients or carers in end-of-life research is a resource intensive challenge. Review of the regulatory and organisational barriers to end-of-life researchers in primary care is required. Research support networks provide invaluable assistance, but researchers should ensure that they are alert to the ways in which they may influence study recruitment.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条