The effects of forage removal on biomass and grain yield of intermediate and spring triticales

被引:10
|
作者
Giunta, Francesco [1 ]
Motzo, Rosella [1 ]
Virdis, Adriana [2 ]
Cabigliera, Agnese [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sassari, Dipartimento Agr, Sez Agron Coltivaz Erbacee & Genet, Via De Nicola 1, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[2] Agris Sardegna, Dipartimento Ric Nelle Prod Vegetali, Viale Trieste 111, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy
关键词
Triticale; Dual purpose; Radiation interception; Radiation use efficiency; Evapotranspiration; Transpiration efficiency; RADIATION-USE EFFICIENCY; FED WINTER-WHEAT; DUAL-PURPOSE; RECOVERY DYNAMICS; PLUS GRAIN; WATER-USE; GROWTH; CEREALS; BARLEY; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2016.10.002
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The dual-purpose use of cereals can be a convenient management option if grain yield (GY) is not significantly reduced. The effects of clipping at the terminal spikelet stage on biomass and grain production of an intermediate ('Bienvenu') and a spring ('Oceania') triticale cultivar grown at two sowing rates (300 and 600 seeds per m(2)) were analysed in terms of the changes induced on radiation and water capture and use and biomass partitioning in five different Mediterranean environments with no additional N application following clipping. Clipped crops were able to recover completely in terms of the fraction of radiation interception (FIPAR) before anthesis, but the period in which plants exhibited a smaller leaf area resulted in a severe reduction - from 20 to 26% depending on the environment-in the total amount of radiation intercepted (IPAR, MJ m(-2)), and consequently, in biomass at anthesis (from 14 to 30%). Radiation use efficiency (RUE) between clipping and anthesis ranged from 0.89 to 1.42 g MJ(-1), and only contributed to the decrease in biomass when leaf nitrogen levels were reduced as a consequence of clipping. Evaporation increased (by 13 mm on average) and transpiration decreased (by 11 mm on average) following clipping, with contrasting but quantitatively small effects on evapotranspiration. Transpiration efficiency decreased by about 20% following clipping in most environments because clipping decreased biomass production more than evapotranspiration in environments that did not allow the triticale crops to reach leaf area index values greater than 3-4. GY varied from about 300 to 850 gm(-2) and was only affected by clipping in the two environments with favourable post-anthesis conditions where unclipped crops showed a higher harvest index (HI, 0.38 unclipped vs 0.36 clipped crops on the average of the two environments). In the environments where a severe water stress (transpiration lower than 18% of reference evapotranspiration) following anthesis led to similar amounts of IPAR under the two treatment conditions, the lower biomass at anthesis of clipped crops lead to a higher HI and no reduction in GY. No interaction between clipping and cultivar was observed for FIPAR. Cultivar differences derived from their different phenologies and were mainly expressed before clipping; the longer duration of the phase prior to clipping (from 0 to 18 days depending on the environment) resulted in the intermediate cultivar being superior in terms of winter forage production (193 vs 135 gm(-2) on average). On the other hand, the intermediate cultivar was less advantageous in terms of GY (270 vs 357 gm(-2)) in the environments presenting the most severe terminal water stress. Sowing rate was only relevant in the pre-clipping period when the higher sowing rate produced, on average, 40% more biomass than the lower sowing density. Dual-purpose triticale can be a convenient management option in Mediterranean environments subjected to severe terminal water stress because GY is not affected and a variable amount of winter forage may be obtained. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:47 / 57
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intercropping legumes and intermediate wheatgrass increases forage yield, nutritive value, and profitability without reducing grain yields
    Pinto, Priscila
    Cartoni-Casamitjana, Stefania
    Cureton, Colin
    Stevens, Andrew W.
    Stoltenberg, David E.
    Zimbric, Joseph
    Picasso, Valentin D.
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [32] Effects of row spacing and intercrop on maize grain yield and forage production of palisade grass
    Borghi, Emerson
    Costa Crusciol, Carlos Alexandre
    Nascente, Adriano Stephan
    Mateus, Gustavo Pavan
    Martins, Priscila Oliveira
    Costa, Ciniro
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2012, 63 (11-12): : 1106 - 1113
  • [33] GRAIN FILLING PERIOD AND GRAIN YIELD RELATIONSHIPS IN SPRING WHEAT
    NASS, HG
    REISER, B
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1975, 55 (03) : 673 - 678
  • [34] YIELD AND MORPHOLOGICAL STUDIES WITH OATS FOR FORAGE AND GRAIN PRODUCTION
    FOLKINS, LP
    KAUFMANN, ML
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1974, 54 (04) : 617 - 620
  • [35] Forage and grain yield of white oat under grazing
    Bortolini, PC
    de Moraes, A
    Carvalho, PCD
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 34 (06): : 2192 - 2199
  • [36] EFFECT OF FORAGE UTILIZATION ON WHEAT-GRAIN YIELD
    DUNPHY, DJ
    MCDANIEL, ME
    HOLT, EC
    CROP SCIENCE, 1982, 22 (01) : 106 - 109
  • [37] Increasing plant density in spring wheat to ameliorate the effects of salinity on grain yield
    Steppuhn, H
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1997, 40 (06): : 1599 - 1606
  • [38] Effects of different grade drought on grain yield of spring maize in Northern China
    Dong, Chaoyang
    Liu, Zhijuan
    Yang, Xiaoguang
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31 (11): : 157 - 164
  • [39] Exploring genetic diversity for grain partitioning traits to enhance yield in a high biomass spring wheat panel
    Sierra-Gonzalez, Aleyda
    Molero, Gemma
    Rivera-Amado, Carolina
    Babar, M. Ali
    Reynolds, Matthew P.
    Foulkes, M. John
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2021, 260
  • [40] Increasing plant density in spring wheat to ameliorate the effects of salinity on grain yield
    ASAE
    不详
    Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., 6 (1599-1606):