Arterial wall histology in chronic pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow device circulatory support

被引:26
|
作者
Potapov, Evgenij V. [1 ]
Dranishnikov, Nikolay [1 ]
Morawietz, Lars [1 ]
Stepanenko, Alexander [1 ]
Rezai, Sajjad [1 ]
Blechschmidt, Cristiane [2 ]
Lehmkuhl, Hans B. [1 ]
Weng, Yuguo [1 ]
Pasic, Miralem [1 ]
Huebler, Michael [1 ]
Hetzer, Roland [1 ]
Krabatsch, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Charite, Inst Neuropathol, Berlin, Germany
来源
关键词
Ventricular assist device; long-term support; continuous flow; pulsatile flow; pathology; arterial wall; LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST; END-ORGAN FUNCTION; DESTINATION THERAPY; SYSTEM; PUMP;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Continuous-flow (CF) ventricular assist devices (VAD) are an established option for treatment of end-stage heart failure. However, the effect of long-term CF with lack of peripheral arterial wall motions on blood pressure regulation and end-organ arterial wall sclerosis, especially in the case of long-term support (> 3 years), remains unclear. METHODS: Tissue samples obtained at autopsy from liver, kidney, coronary arteries, and brain from 27 VAD recipients supported for > 180 days between 2000 and 2010 were histologically examined to assess vascular alterations, including perivascular infiltrate, intravascular infiltrate, wall thickness, thrombosis, endothelial cell swelling, vessel wall necrosis, and pen-vascular fibrosis. Pulsatile-flow (PF) devices had been inserted in 9 patients and CF devices had been inserted in 16. The pathologist was blinded to the group distribution. Demographic, pharmacologic, and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed before surgery and during the follow-up period of up to 24 months. RESULTS: Median duration of support was 467 days (range, 235-1,588 days) in the PF group and 263 days (range, 182-942 days) in the CF group. Demographic and clinical data before and after surgery were similar. Amiodarone was more often used during follow-up in CF group than in the PF group (61% vs 10%, p = 0.009). Throughout the follow-up period, mean arterial pressure did not differ between recipients of the 2 pump types, nor did systolic and diastolic pressure, except at 2 weeks after VAD implantation, when systolic blood pressure was higher (p = 0.05) and diastolic lower (p = 0.03) in the PF group. Histologic studies did not identify any relevant differences in arterial wall characteristics between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term mechanical circulatory support with CF devices does not adversely influence arterial wall properties of the end-organ vasculature. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012; 31: 1171-1176 (C) 2012 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1176
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acute and chronic effects of continuous-flow support and pulsatile-flow support
    Miyamoto, Takuma
    Karimov, Jamshid H.
    Fukamachi, Kiyotaka
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2019, 43 (07) : 618 - 623
  • [2] Infectious complications after pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation
    Schaffer, Justin M.
    Allen, Jeremiah G.
    Weiss, Eric S.
    Arnaoutakis, George J.
    Patel, Nishant D.
    Russell, Stuart D.
    Shah, Ashish S.
    Conte, John V.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (02): : 164 - 174
  • [3] Neurocognitive function in destination therapy patients receiving continuous-flow vs pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device support
    Petrucci, Ralph J.
    Rogers, Joseph G.
    Blue, Laura
    Gallagher, Colleen
    Russell, Stuart D.
    Dordunoo, Dzifa
    Jaski, Brian E.
    Chillcott, Suzanne
    Sun, Benjamin
    Yanssens, Tammy L.
    Tatooles, Antone
    Koundakjian, Lalig
    Farrar, David J.
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 31 (01): : 27 - 36
  • [4] Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility?
    Cheng, Allen
    Williamitis, Christine A.
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 3 (06) : 573 - 581
  • [5] Quantification of arterial pressure and pump-flow waveforms for pulsatile- and continuous-flow devices during chronic support
    Ündar, A
    Fraser, CD
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 22 (06): : 706 - 706
  • [6] Mechanical ocular pulsatile-flow model to challenge the 'Ocular Blood Flow' (OBF)-device with known pulsatile-flow values
    Hendrickson, P
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1999, 214 (05) : 272 - 274
  • [7] Effects of Continuous-Flow Versus Pulsatile-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Myocardial Unloading and Remodeling
    Kato, Tomoko S.
    Chokshi, Aalap
    Singh, Parvati
    Khawaja, Tuba
    Cheema, Faisal
    Akashi, Hirokazu
    Shahzad, Khurram
    Iwata, Shinichi
    Homma, Shunichi
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Jorde, Ulrich
    Farr, Maryjane
    Mancini, Donna M.
    Schulze, P. Christian
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2011, 4 (05) : 546 - U34
  • [8] Clinical outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricular assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices
    Garatti, Andrea
    Bruschi, Giuseppe
    Colombo, Tiziano
    Russo, Claudio
    Lanfranconi, Marco
    Milazzo, Filippo
    Frigerio, Maria
    Vitali, Ettore
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 34 (02) : 275 - 280
  • [9] Complications of Continuous-Flow Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
    Patel, Harsh
    Madanieh, Raef
    Kosmas, Constantine E.
    Vatti, Satya K.
    Vittorio, Timothy J.
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 9 : 15 - 21
  • [10] Determinants of Survival in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation with Continuous-Flow Versus Pulsatile-Flow Ventricular Assist Devices
    Nativi, J. N.
    Kucheryavaya, A. Y.
    Edwards, L. B.
    Taylor, D.
    Hertz, M. I.
    Stehlik, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (02): : S87 - S88