Genotoxicity biomarkers in aquatic bioindicators

被引:104
|
作者
Bolognesi, Claudia [1 ]
Cirillo, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ San Martino IST, Ist Nazl Ric Cancro, Environm Carcinogenesis Unit, Genoa, Italy
关键词
Aquatic animals; Genotoxicity; Bioindicator; Biomarker; Micronucleus test; Comet assay; Bivalve; Mussel; MUSSELS MYTILUS-EDULIS; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE ACTIVITY; REPRODUCTION IMPAIRMENT; LYSOSOMAL STABILITY; COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS; GAMMARUS FOSSARUM; HEPATIC NEOPLASMS; MICRONUCLEUS TEST; GENETIC-DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1093/czoolo/60.2.273
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Pollution of the aquatic environment is an ever-growing problem, as waters are the ultimate sink for the large number of xenobiotics from multiple sources. DNA damaging agents have a significant ecological relevance since they are implicated in many pathological processes and exert effects beyond that of individual being active through following generations. A large number of methods have been applied to evaluate genotoxic damage in different aquatic species. Comet assay, as method for detecting DNA alterations, and micronucleus test, as an index of chromosomal damage are the most widely applied and validated methods in field studies. These methods were applied in different vertebrate and invertebrate aquatic species, but only mollusk and fish species have been employed in routine biomonitoring programs. Mussels, due to their widely geographical distribution and the suitability for caging represent the bioindicator of choice in field studies. Mytilus species is the most used marine mussel. The use of fish is limited to specific geographic areas. The present review mainly focuses on the application of comet assay and micronucleus test in mussels. A number of biomonitoring studies in mussels, using comet assay or micronucleus test, revealed exposure to different classes of genotoxic compounds with a good discrimination power. The different evidence from the two assays, reflects different biological mechanisms for the two genetic endpoints, DNA damage and chromosomal damage, suggesting their combined application in the field. Different endogenous and exogenous factors have been shown to modulate the genotoxic responses in mussels, acting as confounding factors in environmental monitoring. The use of standardized protocol for caging, sampling and genotoxity evaluation is critical in biomonitoring studies. The use of a multimarker approach coupling genotoxicity biomarkers with physiological and biochemical factors allows to have a complete picture of the environmental pollution
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 284
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genotoxicity and biodegradation of quaternary ammonium salts in aquatic environments
    Grabinska-Sota, Elzbieta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 195 : 182 - 187
  • [42] Development of genotoxicity assay systems that use aquatic organisms
    Hayashi, M
    Ueda, T
    Uyeno, K
    Wada, K
    Kinae, N
    Saotome, K
    Tanaka, N
    Takai, A
    Sasaki, YF
    Asano, N
    Sofuni, T
    Ojima, Y
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 399 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [43] Genotoxicity tests and their use in occupational toxicology as biomarkers
    Sardas, S
    [J]. INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 14 (06) : 521 - 525
  • [44] Novel miRNA biomarkers for genotoxicity screening in mouse
    Oka, Hiroyuki
    Masuno, Koichi
    Uehara, Takeki
    Okamoto, Toru
    Matsuura, Yoshiharu
    Nakano, Toru
    Yamaguchi, Shinpei
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 404 : 68 - 75
  • [45] The use and interpretation of biomarkers of environmental genotoxicity in humans
    Albertini, RJ
    [J]. BIOTHERAPY, 1998, 11 (2-3) : 155 - 167
  • [46] The role of various biomarkers in the evaluation of styrene genotoxicity
    Vodicka, P
    Koskinen, M
    Stetina, R
    Soucek, P
    Vodickova, L
    Matousu, Z
    Kuricova, M
    Hemminki, K
    [J]. CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 2003, 27 (04): : 275 - 284
  • [47] Genotoxicity tests - Application to occupational exposure as biomarkers
    Karakaya, AE
    Sardas, S
    Burgaz, S
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DNA DAMAGE AND REPAIR: OXYGEN RADICAL EFFECTS, CELLULAR PROTECTION, AND BIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES, 1999, 302 : 181 - 191
  • [48] Proteomics Approach to Find New Biomarkers for Genotoxicity
    Suzuki, Takayoshi
    [J]. DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2009, 41 : 9 - 10
  • [49] Bioindicators of climate and trophic state in lowland and highland aquatic ecosystems of the Northern Neotropics
    Perez, Liseth
    Lorenschat, Julia
    Massaferro, Julieta
    Pailles, Christine
    Sylvestre, Florence
    Hollwedel, Werner
    Brandorff, Gerd-Oltmann
    Brenner, Mark
    Islebe, Gerald
    Lozano, Maria del Socorro
    Scharf, Burkhard
    Schwalb, Antje
    [J]. REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA TROPICAL, 2013, 61 (02) : 603 - 644
  • [50] Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental monitoring, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems
    Hodkinson, ID
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 35 (05) : 649 - 666