Genotoxicity biomarkers in aquatic bioindicators

被引:104
|
作者
Bolognesi, Claudia [1 ]
Cirillo, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ San Martino IST, Ist Nazl Ric Cancro, Environm Carcinogenesis Unit, Genoa, Italy
关键词
Aquatic animals; Genotoxicity; Bioindicator; Biomarker; Micronucleus test; Comet assay; Bivalve; Mussel; MUSSELS MYTILUS-EDULIS; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE ACTIVITY; REPRODUCTION IMPAIRMENT; LYSOSOMAL STABILITY; COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS; GAMMARUS FOSSARUM; HEPATIC NEOPLASMS; MICRONUCLEUS TEST; GENETIC-DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1093/czoolo/60.2.273
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Pollution of the aquatic environment is an ever-growing problem, as waters are the ultimate sink for the large number of xenobiotics from multiple sources. DNA damaging agents have a significant ecological relevance since they are implicated in many pathological processes and exert effects beyond that of individual being active through following generations. A large number of methods have been applied to evaluate genotoxic damage in different aquatic species. Comet assay, as method for detecting DNA alterations, and micronucleus test, as an index of chromosomal damage are the most widely applied and validated methods in field studies. These methods were applied in different vertebrate and invertebrate aquatic species, but only mollusk and fish species have been employed in routine biomonitoring programs. Mussels, due to their widely geographical distribution and the suitability for caging represent the bioindicator of choice in field studies. Mytilus species is the most used marine mussel. The use of fish is limited to specific geographic areas. The present review mainly focuses on the application of comet assay and micronucleus test in mussels. A number of biomonitoring studies in mussels, using comet assay or micronucleus test, revealed exposure to different classes of genotoxic compounds with a good discrimination power. The different evidence from the two assays, reflects different biological mechanisms for the two genetic endpoints, DNA damage and chromosomal damage, suggesting their combined application in the field. Different endogenous and exogenous factors have been shown to modulate the genotoxic responses in mussels, acting as confounding factors in environmental monitoring. The use of standardized protocol for caging, sampling and genotoxity evaluation is critical in biomonitoring studies. The use of a multimarker approach coupling genotoxicity biomarkers with physiological and biochemical factors allows to have a complete picture of the environmental pollution
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 284
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating Bioindicators and Biomarkers in Aquatic Ecotoxicology: An Overview
    Calisi, Antonio
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (21):
  • [2] Chromosome aberrations as bioindicators of environmental genotoxicity
    Ibrulj, Slavica
    Haveric, Sanin
    Haveric, Anja
    [J]. BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 7 (04) : 311 - 316
  • [3] Aquatic Fungi as Bioindicators of Freshwater Ecosystems
    Barros, Juliana
    Ben Tanfous, Sarra
    Seena, Sahadevan
    [J]. Water (Switzerland), 2024, 16 (23)
  • [4] Genotoxicity Biomarkers in the Monitoring of the Aquatic Environment: In Situ Case-studies Along the Italian Coast
    Bolognesi, C.
    Sciutto, A.
    Roggieri, P.
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2011, 39 (01): : 61 - 62
  • [5] AQUATIC OLIGOCHAETA - SUPPLEMENT TO THE LIST OF LIMNOSAPROBIC BIOINDICATORS
    UZUNOV, Y
    [J]. DOKLADI NA BOLGARSKATA AKADEMIYA NA NAUKITE, 1979, 32 (08): : 1101 - 1103
  • [6] Constraints in the use of bioindicators and biomarkers in ecotoxicology
    Migula, PJ
    [J]. BIOINDICATOR SYSTEMS FOR SOIL POLLUTION, 1996, 10 : 17 - 29
  • [7] AQUATIC MACROPHYTES AS BIOINDICATORS OF METALS IN WATER RESERVOIRS IN VENEZUELA
    Garcia, Tomas A.
    Ramos Fonseca, Ruth
    [J]. REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE CONTAMINACION AMBIENTAL, 2022, 38 : 95 - 109
  • [8] Fish as bioindicators of radiocaesium pollution in aquatic environment in Greece
    Florou, H
    Chaloulou, C
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 1997, 6 (1-2): : 9 - 15
  • [9] Cyanobacteria as bioindicators and bioreporters of environmental analysis in aquatic ecosystems
    Mateo, Pilar
    Leganes, Francisco
    Perona, Elvira
    Loza, Virginia
    Fernandez-Pinas, Francisca
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2015, 24 (04) : 909 - 948
  • [10] Predatory aquatic beetles, suitable trace elements bioindicators
    Burghelea, Carmen I.
    Zaharescu, Dragos G.
    Hooda, Peter S.
    Palanca-Soler, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2011, 13 (05): : 1308 - 1315