Dynamic vulnerability assessment of process plants with respect to vapor cloud explosions

被引:51
|
作者
Chen, Chao [1 ]
Khakzad, Nima [2 ]
Reniers, Genserik [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Safety & Secur Sci Grp, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Ryerson Univ, Sch Occupat & Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Antwerp, Fac Appl Econ, Antwerp Res Grp Safety & Secur ARGoSS, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] KULeuven, CEDON, Campus Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Vapor cloud explosion; Process plants; Spatial-temporal evolution; Dynamic event tree; Uncertainty modeling; SECURITY RISK-ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; MODEL; FREQUENCIES; DISPERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2020.106934
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Vapor cloud explosion (VCE) accidents in recent years such as the Buncefield accident in 2005 indicate that VCEs in process plants may lead to unpredicted overpressures, resulting in catastrophic disasters. Although a lot of attempts have been done to assess VCEs in process plants, little attention has been paid to the spatial-temporal evolution of VCEs. This study, therefore, aims to develop a dynamic methodology based on discrete dynamic event tree to assess the likelihood of VCEs and the vulnerability of installations. The developed methodology consists of six steps: (i) identification of hazardous installations and potential loss of containment (LOC), (ii) analysis of vapor cloud dispersion, (iii) identification and characterization of ignition sources, (iv) explosion frequency and delayed time assessment using the dynamic event tree, (v) overpressure calculation by the Multi-Energy method and (vi) damage assessment based on probit models. This methodology considers the time dependencies in vapor cloud dispersion and in the uncertainty of delayed ignitions. Application of the methodology to a case study shows that the methodology can reflect the characteristics of large VCEs and avoid underestimating the consequences. Besides, this study indicates that ignition control may be regarded as a delay measure, effective emergency actions are needed for preventing VCEs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detonations and vapor cloud explosions: Why it matters
    Johnson, D. M.
    Tomlin, G. B.
    Walker, D. G.
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2015, 36 : 360 - 366
  • [22] Predicting vapor cloud explosions in enclosed spaces
    Alexeev S.G.
    Gur’ev E.S.
    Poluyan L.V.
    Barbin N.M.
    Coke and Chemistry, 2017, 60 (9) : 366 - 374
  • [23] Mechanisms and occurrence of detonations in vapor cloud explosions
    Oran, Elaine S.
    Chamberlain, Geoffrey
    Pekalski, Andrzej
    PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2020, 77
  • [24] Dust explosions in process plants
    Buschart, RJ
    INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS SOCIETY 44TH ANNUAL PETROLEUM AND CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CONFERENCE, 1997, : 239 - 247
  • [25] UNCONFINED VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSIONS - THE ASYMMETRICAL BLAST FROM AN ELONGATED CLOUD
    PICKLES, JH
    BITTLESTON, SH
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1983, 51 (01) : 45 - 53
  • [26] BLAST EFFECT FROM UNCONFINED VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSIONS
    ROBERTS, AF
    PRITCHARD, DK
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS, 1982, 3 (04): : 231 - 247
  • [27] EVALUATION OF VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSIONS BY DAMAGE ANALYSIS - COMMENT
    VANDENBERG, AC
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1988, 19 (03) : 321 - 321
  • [28] Accounting for channeling and shielding effects for vapor cloud explosions
    Wesevich, James
    Hassig, Paul
    Nikodym, Lisa
    Nasri, Vincent
    Mould, John
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 50 : 205 - 220
  • [29] Methods of Predicting Vapor Cloud Explosions in Enclosed Spaces
    Alexeev, S. G.
    Poluyan, L. V.
    Gur'ev, E. S.
    Barbin, N. M.
    COKE AND CHEMISTRY, 2018, 61 (08) : 312 - 317
  • [30] Survey of vapor cloud explosions. Second update
    Lenoir, Eric M.
    Davenport, John A.
    Process Safety Progress, 1993, 12 (01) : 12 - 33