Anaerobic bacterial flora of intra-abdominal infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in Kuwait

被引:5
|
作者
Panigrahi, D [1 ]
Rotimi, VO [1 ]
Dhar, R [1 ]
Chugh, TD [1 ]
Dhar, PM [1 ]
Ghali, A [1 ]
Saad, A [1 ]
Sanyal, SC [1 ]
Varghese, TL [1 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Univ, Fac Allied Hlth, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sulibikhat 90805, Kuwait
关键词
intra-abdominal infections; anaerobic bacteria; antibiotic susceptibility;
D O I
10.1006/anae.2001.0404
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Clinical samples obtained from 200 patients with intra-abdominal infections were investigated for the presence of anaerobic bacteria. The majority of samples were from patients with appendicitis (108, 54%) followed by peritoneal abscess/peritonitis (37, 18.5%). A total of 153 anaerobes were isolated from 83 culture positive specimens with an isolation rate of 1.8 per sample. Ninety (59%) yielded Bacteroides fragilis group and B. fragilis stricto sensu accounted for half of them. Other isolates were 36 (23.5%) Prevotella species and 15 (9.8%) Peptostreptococcus micros. The susceptibility of the 153 isolates against eight antibiotics was determined by the E-test. All the isolates were susceptible to metronidazole, MIC(90)s varying between 1-2 mug/mL. The Prevotella spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Fusobacterium spp. and Porphyromonas spp. were all susceptible to clindamycin (MIC(90)s = 0.25-2 mug/mL respectively), imipenem (MIC(90)s = 0.12-0.5 mug/mL respectively) and meropenem (MIC90 = 0.25 mug/mL each). About 25% of the B. fragilis group were resistant to clindamycin with MIC more than 256 mug/mL. Piperacillintazobactam also exhibited excellent in vitro activity against all the isolates (MIC90 = 0.25 mug/mL). (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 295
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of ESBLs producers from pus in patients with abdominal trauma associated intra-abdominal infections
    S. Fan
    J. Wang
    Y. Li
    J. Li
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2017, 43 : 65 - 71
  • [22] Intra-Abdominal Infections
    Mazuski, John E.
    Solomkin, Joseph S.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 89 (02) : 421 - +
  • [23] Bacteriology and antimicrobial susceptibility of ESBLs producers from pus in patients with abdominal trauma associated intra-abdominal infections
    Fan, S.
    Wang, J.
    Li, Y.
    Li, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2017, 43 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [24] The role of the intra-abdominal view in complicated intra-abdominal infections
    Matti Tolonen
    Ville Sallinen
    Ari Leppäniemi
    Minna Bäcklund
    Panu Mentula
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14
  • [25] ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF DACTIMICIN AGAINST AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC-BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM INTRA-ABDOMINAL INFECTIONS
    NORD, CE
    KAGER, L
    DRUGS UNDER EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 15 (03) : 113 - 114
  • [26] Antimicrobial therapy for surgical prophylaxis and for intra-abdominal and gynecologic infections
    Weigelt, JA
    Faro, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 176 (06): : 1S - 3S
  • [27] New antimicrobial options for the management of complicated intra-abdominal infections
    Leone, Sebastiano
    Damiani, Giovanni
    Pezone, Ilaria
    Kelly, Molly E.
    Cascella, Marco
    Alfieri, Aniello
    Pace, Maria C.
    Fiore, Marco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 38 (05) : 819 - 827
  • [28] New developments and concepts in antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infections
    Younes Z.
    Johnson D.A.
    Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2000, 2 (4) : 277 - 282
  • [29] Consensus statement on antimicrobial therapy of intra-abdominal infections in Asia
    Hsueh, Po-Ren
    Hawkey, Peter Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 30 (02) : 129 - 133
  • [30] ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP IMPACT ON THE TREATMENT OF INTRA-ABDOMINAL INFECTIONS IN THE SICU
    Peterson, Meghan
    Flynn, Jade
    Smith, Michael
    Rumbaugh, Kelli
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2025, 53 (01)