Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning

被引:28
|
作者
Van Den Bos, Esther [1 ]
Poletiek, Fenna H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, NL-2300 RB Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.3758/MC.36.6.1122
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study identified two aspects of complexity that have been manipulated in the implicit learning literature and investigated how they affect implicit and explicit learning of artificial grammars. Ten finite state grammars were used to vary complexity. The results indicated that dependency length is more relevant to the complexity of a structure than is the number of associations that have to be learned. Although implicit learning led to better performance on a grammaticality judgment test than did explicit learning, it was negatively affected by increasing complexity: Performance decreased as there was an increase in the number of previous letters that had to be taken into account to determine whether or not the next letter was a grammatical continuation. In particular, the results suggested that implicit learning of higher order dependencies is hampered by the presence of longer dependencies. Knowledge of first-order dependencies was acquired regardless of complexity and learning mode.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1131
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ARTIFICIAL GRAMMAR LEARNING AND IMPLICIT MEMORY - REPLY
    KNOWLTON, B
    SQUIRE, LR
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (01) : 61 - 61
  • [42] “Artificial grammar learning” in pigeons: A preliminary analysis
    Walter T. Herbranson
    Charles P. Shimp
    Learning & Behavior, 2003, 31 (1) : 98 - 106
  • [43] Implicit learning of a recursive rule in an artificial grammar
    Poletiek, FH
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2002, 111 (03) : 323 - 335
  • [44] Unconfounding similarity and rules in artificial grammar learning
    Bailey, TM
    Pothos, EM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTIETH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1998, : 96 - 101
  • [45] The subjective experience of remembering in artificial grammar learning
    Tunney, Richard J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 19 (06): : 934 - 952
  • [46] Dissociating Sources of Knowledge in Artificial Grammar Learning
    Hendricks, Michelle A.
    Conway, Christopher M.
    Kellogg, Ronald T.
    COGNITION IN FLUX, 2010, : 1393 - 1398
  • [47] Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning
    Tanaka, Daisuke
    Kiyokawa, Sachiko
    Yamada, Ayumi
    Dienes, Zoltan
    Shigemasu, Kazuo
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2008, 15 (06) : 1154 - 1159
  • [48] Artificial grammar learning in Alzheimer’s disease
    Paul J. Reber
    Lucy A. Martinez
    Sandra Weintraub
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2003, 3 : 145 - 153
  • [49] Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia
    Zimmerer, Vitor C.
    Cowell, Patricia E.
    Varley, Rosemary A.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 53 : 25 - 38
  • [50] Eye Movements in Implicit Artificial Grammar Learning
    Silva, Susana
    Inacio, Filomena
    Folia, Vasiliki
    Petersson, Karl Magnus
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (09) : 1387 - 1402