Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation

被引:28
|
作者
Crestani, Ana Paula [1 ,2 ]
Boos, Flavia Zacouteguy [1 ,2 ]
Haubrich, Josue [1 ,2 ]
Sierra, Rodrigo Ordonez [1 ,2 ]
Santana, Fabiana [1 ,2 ]
Duran Molina, Johanna Marcela [1 ,2 ]
Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas [1 ,2 ]
Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira [1 ,2 ]
Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Psychobiol & Neurocomputat Lab, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Neurosci Grad Program, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2015年 / 5卷
关键词
FEAR MEMORY; CONDITIONED FEAR; WORKING-MEMORY; AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORIES; NMDA RECEPTORS; EYE-MOVEMENTS; EXTINCTION; VIVIDNESS; AMYGDALA; EMDR;
D O I
10.1038/srep13633
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Brief memory reactivation may not improve visual perception
    Zhu, Jun-Ping
    Zhang, Jun-Yun
    VISION RESEARCH, 2025, 227
  • [32] The auditory stimulus facilitates memory guidance in distractor suppression in males with substance use disorder
    Cai, Biye
    Wang, Jinjin
    Sang, Hanbin
    Zhang, Zonghao
    Wang, Aijun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [33] Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception
    Suk Won Han
    Cognitive Processing, 2018, 19 : 117 - 123
  • [34] Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception
    Han, Suk Won
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2018, 19 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [35] Memory reactivation and consolidation during sleep
    Paller, KA
    Voss, JL
    LEARNING & MEMORY, 2004, 11 (06) : 664 - 670
  • [36] Reactivation and consolidation of memory during sleep
    Rasch, Bjoern
    Born, Jan
    CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (03) : 188 - 192
  • [37] Strengthening of memory by reactivation during sleep
    不详
    NEUROSCIENTIST, 2010, 16 (02): : 116 - 116
  • [38] Memory Reactivation in Healthy Aging: Evidence of Stimulus-Specific Dedifferentiation
    St-Laurent, Marie
    Abdi, Herve
    Bondad, Ashley
    Buchsbaum, Bradley R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 34 (12): : 4175 - 4186
  • [39] Extinction during memory reconsolidation blocks recovery of fear in adolescents
    Johnson, D. C.
    Casey, B. J.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [40] Theta resynchronization during reconsolidation of remote contextual fear memory
    Narayanan, Rajeevan T.
    Seidenbecher, Thomas
    Sangha, Susan
    Stork, Oliver
    Pape, Hans-Christian
    NEUROREPORT, 2007, 18 (11) : 1107 - 1111