A direct observation of bacterial coverage and biofilm formation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans on chalcopyrite and pyrite surfaces

被引:21
|
作者
Yang, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Tan, S. N. [1 ]
Glenn, A. M. [1 ]
Harmer, S. [2 ]
Bhargava, S. [3 ]
Chen, M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Mineral Resources Flagship, Clayton, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Chem & Phys Sci, Bedford Pk, SA 5042, Australia
[3] RMIT Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Ctr Adv Mat & Ind Chem, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans; attachment; sulfide minerals; ToF-SIMS; EBSD; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; RAY-PHOTOELECTRON-SPECTROSCOPY; OXIDATION; VISUALIZATION; FUNDAMENTALS; ORIENTATION; MECHANISMS; ADSORPTION; MINERALS; ADHESION;
D O I
10.1080/08927014.2015.1073720
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
To obtain a fundamental understanding of the population behaviour of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans at chalcopyrite and pyrite surfaces, the early stage attachment behaviour and biofilm formation by this bacterium on chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and pyrite (FeS2) were studied by optical microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The results indicate there was no significant difference in selectivity of bacterial attachment between chalcopyrite and pyrite. However, the result of ToF-SIMS analysis suggests that the surface of the pyrite was covered more extensively by biofilm than that of the chalcopyrite, which may indicate more extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) formation by bacterial cells growing on pyrite. EBSD and optical image analysis indicated that selectivity of bacterial attachment to chalcopyrite was not significantly affected by crystal orientation. The results also suggest that the bacterial population in defective areas of chalcopyrite was significantly higher than on the polished surfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 586
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of poultry processing equipment surfaces for susceptibility to bacterial attachment and biofilm formation
    Arnold, JW
    Silvers, S
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2000, 79 (08) : 1215 - 1221
  • [42] Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Polymer Surfaces as a Substrate for Bacterial Attachment and Biofilm Formation
    Webb, Hayden K.
    Crawford, Russell J.
    Sawabe, Tom
    Ivanova, Elena P.
    MICROBES AND ENVIRONMENTS, 2009, 24 (01) : 39 - 42
  • [43] Recent developments in smart antibacterial surfaces to inhibit biofilm formation and bacterial infections
    Li X.
    Wu B.
    Chen H.
    Nan K.
    Jin Y.
    Sun L.
    Wang B.
    Nan, Kaihui (nankh@163.com), 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry (06) : 4274 - 4292
  • [44] A comprehensive comparison of biofilm formation and capsule production for bacterial survival on hospital surfaces
    Nunez, Charles
    Kostoulias, Xenia
    Peleg, Anton
    Short, Francesca
    Qu, Yue
    BIOFILM, 2023, 5
  • [45] Recent developments in smart antibacterial surfaces to inhibit biofilm formation and bacterial infections
    Li, Xi
    Wu, Biao
    Chen, Hao
    Nan, Kaihui
    Jin, Yingying
    Sun, Lin
    Wang, Bailiang
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B, 2018, 6 (26) : 4274 - 4292
  • [46] Method for Direct Observation of Biofilm Formation During Operation on Forward Osmosis Membranes
    Deneff, Jacob I.
    McCutcheon, Jeffrey R.
    Shor, Leslie M.
    2014 40TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (NEBEC), 2014,
  • [47] Quantitative Characterization of the Influence of the Nanoscale Morphology of Nanostructured Surfaces on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
    Singh, Ajay Vikram
    Vyas, Varun
    Patil, Rajendra
    Sharma, Vimal
    Scopelliti, Pasquale Emanuele
    Bongiorno, Gero
    Podesta, Alessandro
    Lenardi, Cristina
    Gade, Wasudev Namdev
    Milani, Paolo
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09):
  • [48] Antimicrobial polymer surfaces to fight bacterial biofilm formation: From basic concepts to applications
    Lienkamp, Karen
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [49] Cutibacterium acnes biofilm formation is influenced by bone microenvironment, implant surfaces and bacterial internalization
    Varin-Simon, Jennifer
    Colin, Marius
    Velard, Frederic
    Tang-Fichaux, Min
    Ohl, Xavier
    Mongaret, Celine
    Gangloff, Sophie C.
    Reffuveille, Fany
    BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [50] Biofilm Formation on Breast Implant Surfaces by Major Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens
    Rezende-Pereira, Gabriel
    Albuquerque, Julia P.
    Souza, Monica C.
    Nogueira, Barbara A.
    Silva, Marlei G.
    Hirata, Raphael
    Mattos-Guaraldi, Ana L.
    Duarte, Rafael S.
    Neves, Felipe P. G.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2021, 41 (10) : 1144 - 1151