The BIOREMA project-Part 2: International interlaboratory comparison for biodiesel test methods

被引:5
|
作者
Ulberth-Buchgraber, Manuela [1 ]
Potalivo, Monica [1 ]
Held, Andrea [1 ]
Baldan, Annarita [2 ]
van der Veen, Adriaan M. H. [2 ]
Ent, Hugo [2 ]
Cunha, Valnei S. [3 ]
Daroda, Romeu J. [3 ]
Lang, Brian [4 ,5 ]
Schantz, Michele [4 ,5 ]
Hearn, Ruth [6 ]
Brown, Richard J. C. [7 ]
Brewer, Paul J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, IRMM, B-2440 Geel, Belgium
[2] VSL, NL-2629 JA Delft, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Metrol Qual & Technol INMETRO, Chem Metrol Div, BR-25250020 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] NIST, Div Biochem Sci, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] NIST, Div Analyt Chem, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[6] LGC, Teddington TW11 0LY, Middx, England
[7] Natl Phys Lab, Analyt Sci Div, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
关键词
BIOREMA project; Biodiesel test methods; FAME; Interlaboratory comparison; Reference value; Proficiency test;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-012-0947-6
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The results of an interlaboratory comparison, using various measurement methods to carry out biodiesel testing, are presented and the findings are discussed. The interlaboratory comparison was organised within the framework of an EU-funded project called BIOREMA. A general overview of the project and results of an interlaboratory comparison on bioethanol are published as Part 1 and 2 of this series of papers. In the study presented here, reference values, provided by national metrology institutes and expert laboratories, were used for evaluating the results. Consensus values, derived from the results of all participants, were used to assess any bias between the results from the national metrology institutes and testing laboratories. The emphasis in this interlaboratory comparison was not the performance rating of the individual laboratories, but recognising and interpreting differences caused by the measurement methods applied. For most biodiesel parameters, a good agreement of measurement results was found among different methods, and between the consensus and reference values. The study material was a rapeseed oil fatty acid methyl ester, for which it was demonstrated that it is feasible to prepare and characterise reference materials for biodiesel with well-established reference values for many parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 39
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interlaboratory comparison of tooth enamel dosimetry on Semipalatinsk region: Part 2, Effects of spectrum processing
    Ivannikov, A.
    Toyoda, S.
    Hoshi, M.
    Zhumadilov, K.
    Fukumura, A.
    Apsalikov, K.
    Bayankin, S.
    Chumak, V.
    Ciesielski, B.
    De Coste, V.
    Endo, S.
    Fattibene, P.
    Ivanov, D.
    Mitchell, C. A.
    Nalapko, M.
    Onori, S.
    Penkowski, M.
    Pivovarov, S.
    Romanyukha, A.
    Rukhin, A. B.
    Sanin, D.
    Schultka, K.
    Seredavina, T.
    Sholom, S.
    Skvortsov, V.
    Stepanenko, V.
    Tanaka, K.
    Trompier, F.
    Wieser, A.
    Wolakiewicz, G.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2007, 42 (6-7) : 1015 - 1020
  • [22] Interlaboratory comparison of the ASTM Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials (E 96-95)
    Kumaran, MK
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 1998, 26 (02) : 83 - 88
  • [23] COMPARISON OF 2 DIAGNOSTIC INTELLIGIBILITY TEST METHODS
    SMITH, CP
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1974, 56 : S52 - S52
  • [24] Interlaboratory comparison of microplastic extraction methods from marine biota tissues: A harmonization exercise of the Plastic Busters MPAs project
    Tsangaris, Catherine
    Panti, Cristina
    Compa, Montserrat
    Peda, Cristina
    Digka, Nikoletta
    Baini, Matteo
    D'Alessandro, Michela D.
    Alomar, Carme
    Patsiou, Danae
    Giani, Dario
    Romeo, Teresa
    Deudero, Salud
    Fossi, Maria Cristina
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2021, 164
  • [25] Comparison of international methods for the determination of total starch in raw sugars: Part II
    Cole, Marsha
    Eggleston, Gillian
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2018, 246 : 99 - 107
  • [26] A Comparison of Two Methods for Measuring Listening Effort As Part of an Audiologic Test Battery
    Johnson, Jani
    Xu, Jingjing
    Cox, Robyn
    Pendergraft, Paul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 24 (03) : 419 - 431
  • [27] Test methods for RCRA hazardous waste characteristics: Part 2
    Parker, K
    AMERICAN LABORATORY, 2003, 35 (01) : 52 - +
  • [28] Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers Part 2: Statistical comparison in a test group
    Rozema, JJ
    Van Dyck, DEM
    Tassignon, MJ
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (01): : 33 - 44
  • [29] A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF ESTABLISHING BAHIAGRASS TEST PLOTS
    BURTON, GW
    CROP SCIENCE, 1989, 29 (01) : 223 - 225
  • [30] A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST
    ERON, LD
    RITTER, AM
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1951, 15 (01): : 55 - 61