The BIOREMA project-Part 2: International interlaboratory comparison for biodiesel test methods

被引:5
|
作者
Ulberth-Buchgraber, Manuela [1 ]
Potalivo, Monica [1 ]
Held, Andrea [1 ]
Baldan, Annarita [2 ]
van der Veen, Adriaan M. H. [2 ]
Ent, Hugo [2 ]
Cunha, Valnei S. [3 ]
Daroda, Romeu J. [3 ]
Lang, Brian [4 ,5 ]
Schantz, Michele [4 ,5 ]
Hearn, Ruth [6 ]
Brown, Richard J. C. [7 ]
Brewer, Paul J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, IRMM, B-2440 Geel, Belgium
[2] VSL, NL-2629 JA Delft, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Metrol Qual & Technol INMETRO, Chem Metrol Div, BR-25250020 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] NIST, Div Biochem Sci, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] NIST, Div Analyt Chem, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[6] LGC, Teddington TW11 0LY, Middx, England
[7] Natl Phys Lab, Analyt Sci Div, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
关键词
BIOREMA project; Biodiesel test methods; FAME; Interlaboratory comparison; Reference value; Proficiency test;
D O I
10.1007/s00769-012-0947-6
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The results of an interlaboratory comparison, using various measurement methods to carry out biodiesel testing, are presented and the findings are discussed. The interlaboratory comparison was organised within the framework of an EU-funded project called BIOREMA. A general overview of the project and results of an interlaboratory comparison on bioethanol are published as Part 1 and 2 of this series of papers. In the study presented here, reference values, provided by national metrology institutes and expert laboratories, were used for evaluating the results. Consensus values, derived from the results of all participants, were used to assess any bias between the results from the national metrology institutes and testing laboratories. The emphasis in this interlaboratory comparison was not the performance rating of the individual laboratories, but recognising and interpreting differences caused by the measurement methods applied. For most biodiesel parameters, a good agreement of measurement results was found among different methods, and between the consensus and reference values. The study material was a rapeseed oil fatty acid methyl ester, for which it was demonstrated that it is feasible to prepare and characterise reference materials for biodiesel with well-established reference values for many parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 39
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The BIOREMA project—Part 2: International interlaboratory comparison for biodiesel test methods
    Manuela Ulberth-Buchgraber
    Monica Potalivo
    Andrea Held
    Annarita Baldan
    Adriaan M. H. van der Veen
    Hugo Ent
    Valnei S. Cunha
    Romeu J. Daroda
    Brian Lang
    Michele Schantz
    Ruth Hearn
    Richard J. C. Brown
    Paul J. Brewer
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2013, 18 : 29 - 39
  • [2] The BIOREMA project-part 3: International interlaboratory comparison for bio-ethanol test methods
    van der Veen, Adriaan M. H.
    Ent, Hugo
    Baldan, Annarita
    da Cunha, Valnei S.
    Daroda, Romeu J.
    Lang, Brian
    Schantz, Michele
    Ulberth-Buchgraber, Manuela
    Held, Andrea
    Hearn, Ruth
    Brown, Richard J. C.
    Brewer, Paul J.
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2013, 18 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [3] The BIOREMA project—part 3: International interlaboratory comparison for bio-ethanol test methods
    Adriaan M. H. van der Veen
    Hugo Ent
    Annarita Baldan
    Valnei S. da Cunha
    Romeu J. Daroda
    Brian Lang
    Michele Schantz
    Manuela Ulberth-Buchgraber
    Andrea Held
    Ruth Hearn
    Richard J. C. Brown
    Paul J. Brewer
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2013, 18 : 41 - 50
  • [4] The BIOREMA project-part 1: Towards international comparability for biofuel analysis
    Baldan, Annarita
    Ent, Hugo
    van der Veen, Adriaan M. H.
    Held, Andrea
    Ulberth-Buchgraber, Manuela
    Daroda, Romeu J.
    da Cunha, Valnei S.
    Wise, Stephen A.
    Schantz, Michele
    Brewer, Paul J.
    Brown, Richard J. C.
    O'Connor, Gavin
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2013, 18 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [5] The BIOREMA project—part 1: Towards international comparability for biofuel analysis
    Annarita Baldan
    Hugo Ent
    Adriaan M. H. van der Veen
    Andrea Held
    Manuela Ulberth-Buchgraber
    Romeu J. Daroda
    Valnei S. da Cunha
    Stephen A. Wise
    Michele Schantz
    Paul J. Brewer
    Richard J. C. Brown
    Gavin O’Connor
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2013, 18 : 19 - 28
  • [6] An interlaboratory comparison of sediment elutriate preparation and toxicity test methods
    Herman J. Haring
    Mark E. Smith
    James M. Lazorchak
    Philip A. Crocker
    Abel Euresti
    Karen Blocksom
    Melissa C. Wratschko
    Michael C. Schaub
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2012, 184 : 7343 - 7351
  • [7] An interlaboratory comparison of sediment elutriate preparation and toxicity test methods
    Haring, Herman J.
    Smith, Mark E.
    Lazorchak, James M.
    Crocker, Philip A.
    Euresti, Abel
    Blocksom, Karen
    Wratschko, Melissa C.
    Schaub, Michael C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2012, 184 (12) : 7343 - 7351
  • [8] First international 26Al interlaboratory comparison -: Part I
    Merchel, S
    Bremser, W
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2004, 223 : 393 - 400
  • [9] First international 26Al interlaboratory comparison -: Part II
    Merchel, S
    Bremser, W
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2005, 239 (03): : 217 - 226
  • [10] Interlaboratory comparison of soil phosphorus extracted by various soil test methods
    Kleinman, PJA
    Sharpley, AN
    Gartley, K
    Jarrell, WM
    Kuo, S
    Menon, RG
    Myers, R
    Reddy, KR
    Skogley, EO
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2001, 32 (15-16) : 2325 - 2345