Patient-maintained propofol sedation using reaction time monitoring: a volunteer safety study

被引:8
|
作者
Allam, S. [1 ]
Anderson, K. J. [2 ]
O'Brien, C. [3 ]
Macpherson, J. A. [4 ]
Gambhir, S. [5 ]
Leitch, J. A. [6 ]
Kenny, G. N. C. [7 ]
机构
[1] Forth Valley Royal Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Larbert, Scotland
[2] Foothills Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Glasgow, Sch Dent, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Liverpool Univ Dent Hosp, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[5] Hairmyres Hosp, E Kilbride, Lanark, Scotland
[6] Scottish Govt, Qual Unit, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[7] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirm, Dept Anaesthesia, Glasgow G31 2ER, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; TARGET-CONTROLLED INFUSION; CONTROLLED SYSTEM; PREMEDICATION; MIDAZOLAM; SURGERY; OXYGEN;
D O I
10.1111/anae.12036
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Previous volunteer studies of an effect-site controlled, patient-maintained sedation system using propofol have demonstrated a risk of over-sedation. We have incorporated a reaction-time monitor into the handset of the patient-maintained sedation system to add an individualised patient-feedback mechanism. This study assessed if such reaction-time feedback modification would reduce the risk of over-sedation in 20 healthy volunteers deliberately attempting to over-administer themselves propofol. All the volunteers successfully sedated themselves without reaching any unsafe endpoints. All volunteers maintained verbal contact throughout, in accordance with the definition of conscious sedation. The mean (SD) lowest SpO2 was 97 (1.7) % when breathing room air and no volunteer required supplementary oxygen. The mean (SD) maximum effect-site propofol concentration reached was 1.7 (0.4) mu g center dot ml-1. The present system was found to be safer than its predecessors, allowing conscious sedation, but preventing over-sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Safety of Monitored Anesthesia Care Using Propofol-Based Sedation for Pleuroscopy
    Vakil, Erik
    Sarkiss, Mona
    Ost, David
    Vial, Macarena R.
    Casal, Roberto F.
    Eapen, Georgie A.
    Grosu, Horiana B.
    RESPIRATION, 2018, 95 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [42] Anaesthetist-controlled versus patient-maintained effect-site targeted propofol sedation during elective primary lower-limb arthroplasty performed under spinal anaesthesia (ACCEPTS): study protocol for a parallel-group randomised comparison trial
    Hewson, David W.
    Worcester, Frank
    Sprinks, James
    Smith, Murray D.
    Buchanan, Heather
    Breedon, Philip
    Hardman, Jonathan G.
    Bedforth, Nigel M.
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [43] A prospective safety study of a low-dose propofol sedation protocol for colonoscopy
    Sipe, Brian W.
    Scheidler, Mark
    Baluyut, Arthur
    Wright, Betty
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 5 (05) : 563 - 566
  • [44] Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine sedation for elective fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A comparative study with propofol
    Shoukry, Randa Ali
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 32 (04) : 483 - 488
  • [45] Propofol versus midazolam for procedural sedation in the emergency department: A study on efficacy and safety
    Lameijer, Heleen
    Sikkema, Ytje T.
    Pol, Albert
    Bosch, Maike G. E.
    Beije, Femke
    Feenstra, Rieneke
    Bens, Bas W. J.
    ter Avest, Ewoud
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (05): : 692 - 696
  • [46] Patient-controlled sedation using propofol during interventional neuroradiologic procedures
    Herrick, IA
    Gelb, AW
    Tseng, PS
    Kirkby, J
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 9 (03) : 237 - 241
  • [47] Anaesthetist-controlled versus patient-maintained effect-site targeted propofol sedation during elective primary lower-limb arthroplasty performed under spinal anaesthesia (ACCEPTS): study protocol for a parallel-group randomised comparison trial
    David W. Hewson
    Frank Worcester
    James Sprinks
    Murray D. Smith
    Heather Buchanan
    Philip Breedon
    Jonathan G. Hardman
    Nigel M. Bedforth
    Trials, 20
  • [48] PATIENT AND ENDOSCOPIST SATISFACTION WITH NURSE ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL CONTINUOUS INFUSION SEDATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AGAINST MIDAZOLAM/FENTANYL AND COMPUTER ASSISTED PROPOFOL SEDATION
    Lin, Otto S.
    La Selva, Danielle
    Tombs, Deborah
    Kozarek, Richard A.
    Ross, Andrew S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB400 - AB400
  • [49] Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and alfentanil during colonoscopy: A pilot study
    Roseveare, C
    Seavell, C
    Patel, P
    Criswell, J
    Shepherd, H
    ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (05) : 482 - 483
  • [50] Patient-controlled sedation with propofol and remifentanil for ERCP: a randomized, controlled study
    Mazanikov, Maxim
    Udd, Marianne
    Kylanpaa, Leena
    Lindstrom, Outi
    Aho, Pekka
    Halttunen, Jorma
    Farkkila, Martti
    Poyhia, Reino
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (02) : 260 - 266