Chemical characterization of PM1.0 aerosol in Delhi and source apportionment using positive matrix factorization

被引:95
|
作者
Jaiprakash [1 ]
Singhai, Amrita [1 ]
Habib, Gazala [1 ]
Raman, Ramya Sunder [2 ]
Gupta, Tarun [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Civil Engn, Delhi, India
[2] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res Bhopal, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Bhopal, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Dept Civil Engn, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Source apportionment; Positive matrix factorization (PMF); Biomass burning; Secondary aerosol; ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATE NITRATE; IMPROVING SOURCE IDENTIFICATION; RESOLVED CARBON FRACTIONS; INDIAN-OCEAN EXPERIMENT; AIR-POLLUTION; URBAN REGION; BLACK CARBON; AMBIENT AIR; TEMPORAL VARIABILITY; EVAPORATIVE LOSSES;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-016-7708-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fine aerosol fraction (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <= 1.0 mu m (PM)(1.0)) over the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi campus was monitored day and night (10 h each) at 30 m height from November 2009 to March 2010. The samples were analyzed for 5 ions (NH4 (+), NO3 (-), SO4 (2-), F-, and Cl-) and 12 trace elements (Na, K, Mg, Ca, Pb, Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, Cd, Cr, and Ni). Importantly, secondary aerosol (sulfate and nitrate) formation was observed during dense foggy events, supporting the fog-smog-fog cycle. A total of 76 samples were used for source apportionment of PM mass. Six factors were resolved by PMF analyses and were identified as secondary aerosol, secondary chloride, biomass burning, soil dust, iron-rich source, and vehicular emission. The geographical location of the sources and/or preferred transport pathways was identified by conditional probability function (for local sources) and potential source contribution function (for regional sources) analyses. Medium- and small-scale metal processing (e.g. steel sheet rolling) industries in Haryana and National Capital Region (NCR) Delhi, coke and petroleum refining in Punjab, and thermal power plants in Pakistan, Punjab, and NCR Delhi were likely contributors to secondary sulfate, nitrate, and secondary chloride at the receptor site. The agricultural residue burning after harvesting season (Sept-Dec and Feb-Apr) in Punjab, and Haryana contributed to potassium at receptor site during November-December and March 2010. The soil dust from North and East Pakistan, and Rajasthan, North-East Punjab, and Haryana along with the local dust contributed to soil dust at the receptor site, during February and March 2010. A combination of temporal behavior and air parcel trajectory ensemble analyses indicated that the iron-rich source was most likely a local source attributed to emissions from metal processing facilities. Further, as expected, the vehicular emissions source did not show any seasonality and was local in origin.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 462
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Source apportionment of indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 in Seattle, Washington, using positive matrix factorization
    Larson, T
    Gould, T
    Simpson, C
    Liu, LJS
    Claiborn, C
    Lewtas, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2004, 54 (09) : 1175 - 1187
  • [32] Chemical characterization and quantitativ e assessment of source-specific health risk of trace metals in PM1.0 at a road site of Delhi, India
    Jai Prakash
    Tarachand Lohia
    Anil K. Mandariya
    Gazala Habib
    Tarun Gupta
    Sanjay K. Gupta
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 8747 - 8764
  • [33] Chemical characterization and quantitativ e assessment of source-specific health risk of trace metals in PM1.0 at a road site of Delhi, India
    Prakash, Jai
    Lohia, Tarachand
    Mandariya, Anil K.
    Habib, Gazala
    Gupta, Tarun
    Gupta, Sanjay K.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (09) : 8747 - 8764
  • [34] PM2.5 source apportionment identified with total and soluble elements in positive matrix factorization
    Li, Wenshuai
    Qi, Yuxuan
    Qu, Wen
    Qu, Wenjun
    Shi, Jinhui
    Zhang, Daizhou
    Liu, Yingchen
    Zhang, Yanjing
    Zhang, Weihang
    Ren, Danyang
    Ma, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Xinfeng
    Yi, Li
    Sheng, Lifang
    Zhou, Yang
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 858
  • [35] Source Apportionment of PM10 by Positive Matrix Factorization in Urban Area of Mumbai, India
    Gupta, Indrani
    Salunkhe, Abhaysinh
    Kumar, Rakesh
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [36] Source apportionment of VOCs in the Los Angeles area using positive matrix factorization
    Brown, Steven G.
    Frankel, Anna
    Hafner, Hilary R.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (02) : 227 - 237
  • [37] PCDD/F Source Apportionment in the Baltic Sea Using Positive Matrix Factorization
    Sundqvist, K. L.
    Tysklind, M.
    Geladi, P.
    Hopke, P. K.
    Wiberg, K.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (05) : 1690 - 1697
  • [38] Comparison of the Chemical Characteristics and Source Apportionment of PM1.0 and PM2.5 Using Real-time Air Quality Monitoring Network Data of Air Pollutants
    Oh, Seungmee
    Kim, Ju Young
    Won, Soo Ran
    Kwon, Sujin
    Lee, Sang-Jin
    Choi, Sung-Deuk
    Lee, Ji Yi
    Shin, Hye Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 39 (04) : 448 - 468
  • [39] Source apportionment of the ambient PM2.5 across St. Louis using constrained positive matrix factorization
    Amato, Fulvio
    Hopke, Philip K.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 46 : 329 - 337
  • [40] Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM2.5 using positive matrix factorization modeling in Shanghai, China
    Wang, Fengwen
    Lin, Tian
    Feng, Jialiang
    Fu, Huaiyu
    Guo, Zhigang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2015, 17 (01) : 197 - 205