Application of the response surface methods to solve inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions

被引:45
|
作者
Cheng, Jin [1 ]
Li, Q. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Bridge Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Bldg & Construct, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Inverse reliability method; Artificial neural network; The response surface method; The first-order reliability method; NEURAL-NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1007/s00466-008-0320-0
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The inverse first-order reliability method (FORM) is considered to be one of the most widely used methods in inverse reliability analysis. It has been recognized that there are shortcomings of the inverse FORM in solving inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions, primarily inefficiency and difficulties involved in evaluating derivatives of the implicit response functions with respect to random variables. In order to apply the inverse FORM to structural inverse reliability analysis, response surface methods can be used to overcome the shortcomings. In the present paper, two different response surface methods, namely the polynomial-based response surface method and the artificial neural network-based response surface method, are developed to solve the inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions, and the accuracy and efficiency of the two response surface methods are demonstrated through two numerical examples of steel structures. It is found that the polynomial-based response surface method is more efficient and accurate than the artificial neural network-based response surface method. Recommendations are made regarding the suitability of the two response surface methods to solve the inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 459
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability analysis of laterally loaded piles using response surface methods
    Tandjiria, V
    Teh, CI
    Low, BK
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2000, 22 (04) : 335 - 355
  • [42] Classification correction of polynomial response surface methods for accurate reliability estimation
    Rashki, Mohsen
    Azarkish, Hassan
    Rostamian, Mehdi
    Bahrpeyma, Abdolhamid
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2019, 81
  • [43] Application of laser surface engineering to solve tribological problems
    Smurov, I.
    Doubenskaia, M.
    Grigoriev, S. N.
    Kotoban, D. V.
    Podrabinnik, P. A.
    JOURNAL OF FRICTION AND WEAR, 2014, 35 (06) : 470 - 476
  • [44] Application of laser surface engineering to solve tribological problems
    I. Smurov
    M. Doubenskaia
    S. N. Grigoriev
    D. V. Kotoban
    P. A. Podrabinnik
    Journal of Friction and Wear, 2014, 35 : 470 - 476
  • [45] DUALITY BETWEEN RANGE AND NO-RESPONSE TESTS AND ITS APPLICATION FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS
    Lin, Yi-Hsuan
    Nakamura, Gen
    Potthast, Roland
    Wang, Haibing
    INVERSE PROBLEMS AND IMAGING, 2021, 15 (02) : 367 - 386
  • [46] Hybrid MCS-FORM approach to solve inverse fracture mechanics reliability problems
    Wellison José de Santana Gomes
    Alexandre Galiani Garmbis
    André Teófilo Beck
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2022, 65
  • [47] Hybrid MCS-FORM approach to solve inverse fracture mechanics reliability problems
    de Santana Gomes, Wellison Jose
    Garmbis, Alexandre Galiani
    Beck, Andre Teofilo
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 65 (03)
  • [48] Research on the response surface restructure method and its application in the reliability analysis
    Xu, Jun
    Zheng, Yingren
    Jisuan Lixue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2002, 19 (02): : 217 - 221
  • [49] An improved response surface method for structural reliability analysis and its application
    Zhang, Zhe
    Li, Sheng-Yong
    Shi, Lei
    Wang, Hui-Li
    Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 24 (08): : 111 - 115
  • [50] Application of response surface method for reliability analysis of stiffened laminated plates
    Yang, Nana
    Das, Purnendu K.
    Yao, Xiongliang
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2015, 10 (06) : 653 - 659