Robust multi-objective calibration strategies - possibilities for improving flood forecasting

被引:11
|
作者
Krausse, T. [1 ]
Cullmann, J. [2 ]
Saile, P. [2 ]
Schmitz, G. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Hydrol, Inst Hydrol & Meteorol, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] Fed Inst Hydrol, 2IHP HWRP Secretariat, D-56068 Koblenz, Germany
关键词
PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; SOIL-MOISTURE; DEPTH; RUNOFF; IDENTIFICATION; ALGORITHMS; MULTIPLE;
D O I
10.5194/hess-16-3579-2012
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Process-oriented rainfall-runoff models are designed to approximate the complex hydrologic processes within a specific catchment and in particular to simulate the discharge at the catchment outlet. Most of these models exhibit a high degree of complexity and require the determination of various parameters by calibration. Recently, automatic calibration methods became popular in order to identify parameter vectors with high corresponding model performance. The model performance is often assessed by a purpose-oriented objective function. Practical experience suggests that in many situations one single objective function cannot adequately describe the model's ability to represent any aspect of the catchment's behaviour. This is regardless of whether the objective is aggregated of several criteria that measure different (possibly opposite) aspects of the system behaviour. One strategy to circumvent this problem is to define multiple objective functions and to apply a multi-objective optimisation algorithm to identify the set of Pareto optimal or non-dominated solutions. Nonetheless, there is a major disadvantage of automatic calibration procedures that understand the problem of model calibration just as the solution of an optimisation problem: due to the complex-shaped response surface, the estimated solution of the optimisation problem can result in different near-optimum parameter vectors that can lead to a very different performance on the validation data. Bardossy and Singh (2008) studied this problem for single-objective calibration problems using the example of hydrological models and proposed a geometrical sampling approach called Robust Parameter Estimation (ROPE). This approach applies the concept of data depth in order to overcome the shortcomings of automatic calibration procedures and find a set of robust parameter vectors. Recent studies confirmed the effectivity of this method. However, all ROPE approaches published so far just identify robust model parameter vectors with respect to one single objective. The consideration of multiple objectives is just possible by aggregation. In this paper, we present an approach that combines the principles of multi-objective optimisation and depth-based sampling, entitled Multi-Objective Robust Parameter Estimation (MOROPE). It applies a multi-objective optimisation algorithm in order to identify non-dominated robust model parameter vectors. Subsequently, it samples parameter vectors with high data depth using a further developed sampling algorithm presented in Krausse and Cullmann (2012a). We study the effectivity of the proposed method using synthetical test functions and for the calibration of a distributed hydrologic model with focus on flood events in a small, pre-alpine, and fast responding catchment in Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:3579 / 3606
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparisons of some improving strategies on NSGA-II for multi-objective inventory system
    [J]. Zandieh, Mostafa (m_zandieh@sbu.ac.ir), 1600, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (34):
  • [42] Comparisons of some improving strategies on MOPSO for multi-objective (r, Q) inventory system
    Moslemi, H.
    Zandieh, M.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (10) : 12051 - 12057
  • [43] AI-Based Ensemble Flood Forecasts and Its Implementation in Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Operation for Reservoir Flood Control
    Guo, Yuxue
    Xu, Yue-Ping
    Yu, Xinting
    Liu, Li
    Gu, Haiting
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2024, 60 (05)
  • [44] An Improving Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization
    Fan, JiShan
    [J]. WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND MINING, 2010, 6318 : 1 - 6
  • [45] Improving generalization of MLPs with multi-objective optimization
    Teixeira, RD
    Braga, AP
    Takahashi, RHC
    Saldanha, RR
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2000, 35 : 189 - 194
  • [46] Multi-objective ensemble forecasting with an application to power transformers
    Peimankar, Abdolrahman
    Weddell, Stephen John
    Jalal, Thahirah
    Lapthorn, Andrew Craig
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 68 : 233 - 248
  • [47] Investigation of a multi-objective optimization tool for engine calibration
    Wu, M. H.
    Lin, W.
    Duan, S. Y.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2008, 222 (D2) : 235 - 249
  • [48] Multi-objective analysis of the Sand Hypoplasticity model calibration
    Mendez, Francisco J.
    Mendez, Miguel A.
    Sciarra, Nicola
    Pasculli, Antonio
    [J]. ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2024, 19 (07) : 4241 - 4254
  • [49] Differential Evolution Strategies for Multi-objective Optimization
    Gujarathi, Ashish M.
    Babu, B. V.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2011), VOL 1, 2012, 130 : 63 - +
  • [50] ROBUST MULTI-PERIOD AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE PORTFOLIO SELECTION
    Jiang, Lin
    Wang, Song
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2021, 17 (02) : 695 - 709