Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity

被引:69
|
作者
Phan, Kevin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rao, Prashanth J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Scherman, Daniel B. [3 ]
Dandie, Gordon [3 ]
Mobbs, Ralph J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Private Hosp, NeuroSpine Clin, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Westmead Hosp, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
Direct lateral interbody fusion; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive; Spinal deformity; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.050
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
We conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and clinical and radiological outcomes of the recently introduced, direct or extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) approach for degenerative spinal deformity disorders. Open fusion and instrumentation has traditionally been the mainstay treatment. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation techniques, with the aim of minimizing surgical trauma and blood loss and reducing hospitalization. From six electronic databases, 21 eligible studies were included for review. The pooled weighted average mean of preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores was 6.8, compared to a postoperative VAS score of 2.9 (p < 0.0001). The weighted average preoperative and postoperative coronal segmental Cobb angles were 3.6 and 1.1 degrees, respectively. The weighted average preoperative and postoperative coronal regional Cobb angles were 19.1 and 10.0 degrees, respectively. Regional lumbar lordosis also significantly improved from 35.8 to 43.3 degrees. Sagittal alignment was comparable pre- and postoperatively (34 mm versus 35.1 mm). The weighted average operative duration was 125.6 minutes, whilst the mean estimated blood loss was 155 mL. The weighted average hospitalization length was 3.6 days. Whilst the available data is limited, minimally invasive XLIF procedures appear to be a promising alternative for the treatment of scoliosis, with improved functional VAS and Oswestry disability index outcomes and restored coronal deformity. Future comparative studies are warranted to assess the long term benefits and risks of XLIF compared to anterior and posterior procedures. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1714 / 1721
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion on the lumbar sagittal spinal profile
    Diedrich, O
    Lüring, C
    Pennekamp, PH
    Perlick, L
    Wallny, T
    Kraft, CN
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2003, 141 (04): : 425 - 432
  • [22] A Comparison of Hidden Blood Loss Between Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients
    Kinoshita, Hayato
    Abe, Eiji
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    Hongo, Michio
    Kasukawa, Yuji
    Kikuchi, Kazuma
    Kudo, Daisuke
    Kimura, Ryota
    Miyakoshi, Naohisa
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023,
  • [23] Pelvic parameters of sagittal balance in extreme lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disc disease
    Johnson, R. D.
    Valore, A.
    Villaminar, A.
    Comisso, M.
    Balsano, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (04) : 576 - 581
  • [24] Prepsoas oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion in deformity surgery
    Miller, Catherine
    Gulati, Puneet
    Bandlish, Deepak
    Chou, Dean
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [25] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18
  • [26] The radiologic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion for correction of adult degenerative lumbar deformity
    Patel, Ravish Shammi
    Suh, Seung Woo
    Kang, Seong Hyun
    Nam, Ki-Youl
    Siddiqui, Shiblee Sabir
    Chang, Dong-Gune
    Yang, Jae Hyuk
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 53 (04) : 502 - 509
  • [27] The Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Correction of Adult Degenerative Lumbar Deformity
    Ravish Shammi Patel
    Seung Woo Suh
    Seong Hyun Kang
    Ki-Youl Nam
    Shiblee Sabir Siddiqui
    Dong-Gune Chang
    Jae Hyuk Yang
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2019, 53 : 502 - 509
  • [28] Segmental lumbar sagittal correction after bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Yson, Sharon C.
    Santos, Edward Rainier G.
    Sembrano, Jonathan N.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 17 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [29] Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Versus Multilevel Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity Trends, Outcomes, and Cost
    Chi, Jialun
    Zhang, Yi
    Fontaine, Andrew
    Zhang, Zhichang
    Wang, Jesse
    Labaran, Lawal
    Li, Xudong
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (05): : E192 - E200
  • [30] Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as Corrective Surgery for Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Matsukura, Yu
    Yoshii, Toshitaka
    Morishita, Shingo
    Sakai, Kenichiro
    Hirai, Takashi
    Yuasa, Masato
    Inose, Hiroyuki
    Kawabata, Atsuyuki
    Utagawa, Kurando
    Hashimoto, Jun
    Tomori, Masaki
    Torigoe, Ichiro
    Yamada, Tsuyoshi
    Kusano, Kazuo
    Otani, Kazuyuki
    Sumiya, Satoshi
    Numano, Fujiki
    Fukushima, Kazuyuki
    Tomizawa, Shoji
    Egawa, Satoru
    Arai, Yoshiyasu
    Shindo, Shigeo
    Okawa, Atsushi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (20)