Impact of Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity score on outcomes for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer

被引:71
|
作者
Robbins, Jared R. [1 ]
Gayar, Omar H. [1 ]
Zaki, Mark [1 ]
Mahan, Meredith [2 ]
Buekers, Thomas [3 ]
Elshaikh, Mohamed A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Women Hlth Serv, Div Gynecol Oncol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
Endometrial; Uterine; Comorbidity; Age-adjusted Charlson; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CO-MORBIDITY; CARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; VALIDATION; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; THERAPY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. To To determine the impact of Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity (AAC) index score on survival outcomes for patients with early stage endometrial cancer. Methods. After IRB-approval, AAC score at time of hysterectomy was retrospectively tabulated by physician chart review for 671 patients with 2009 FIGO stage I-II endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Patients were grouped based on their AAC scores as follows: 0-1 (n = 204), 2-3 (n = 293) and >3 (n = 174). Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test methods and univariate and multivariate modeling with Cox regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors of each survival endpoint. Results. After a median follow-up of 85 months, 225 deaths were recorded (34 from EC and 191 from other causes) with a 7-year Overall (OS) and Disease-specific survival (DSS) of 77.6% and 94.0%, respectively. Based on MC grouping, the 7-year OS, DSS, and Recurrence-free survival (RFS) were: 92.9%, 96.8%, and 94.9% for MC 0-1; 81.7%, 95.3%, and 89.8% for MC 2-3: and 56%, 88.2%, and 84.9% for MC > 3 (p < 0.0001, p = 0.005 and p = 0.013, respectively). On multivariate analyses, higher AAC score, tumor grade, lower uterine segment involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion were significantly independent predictors for shorter OS, while for DSS and RFS, higher tumor grade and lymphovascular space invasion were significant predictors of worse outcome, but higher MC score was not. Conclusions. Comorbidity score is as important as pathological features for predicting overall survival outcomes in patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Higher MC scores accurately predicted for worse OS. Comorbidity score should be considered in prospective clinical trials of endometrial carcinoma. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 597
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in recurrent glioblastoma: a new prognostic factor?
    Barz, Melanie
    Bette, Stefanie
    Janssen, Insa
    Aftahy, A. Kaywan
    Huber, Thomas
    Liesche-Starnecker, Friederike
    Ryang, Yu-Mi
    Wiestler, Benedikt
    Combs, Stephanie E.
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Gempt, Jens
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [42] Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in recurrent glioblastoma: a new prognostic factor?
    Melanie Barz
    Stefanie Bette
    Insa Janssen
    A. Kaywan Aftahy
    Thomas Huber
    Friederike Liesche-Starnecker
    Yu-Mi Ryang
    Benedikt Wiestler
    Stephanie E. Combs
    Bernhard Meyer
    Jens Gempt
    BMC Neurology, 22
  • [43] Association of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index and systemic inflammation with survival in gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Huang, Ying-Qi
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Lu, Jun
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Cao, Long-long
    Lin, Mi
    Tu, Ruhong
    Huang, Ze-Ning
    Lin, Ju-Li
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    Li, Ping
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (12): : 2465 - 2472
  • [44] Predictive Role of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index for Long-Term Survival of Surgical Esophageal Cancer Patients
    Yang, Yanhui
    Yuan, Yong
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (08) : 5099 - 5100
  • [45] Age adjusted charlson comorbidity score is associated with treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
    Koppie, Theresa M.
    Serio, Angel M.
    Vora, Kinjal
    Dalbagni, Guido
    Herr, Harry W.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Bochner, Bernard H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 499 - 499
  • [46] Adjusted Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index Score as a Risk Measure of Perioperative Mortality before Cancer Surgery (vol 11, e0148076, 2016)
    Chang, Chun-Ming
    Yin, Wen-Yao
    Wei, Chang-Kao
    Wu, Chin-Chia
    Su, Yu-Chieh
    Yu, Chia-Hui
    Lee, Ching-Chih
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [47] Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score is the best predictor for severe clinical outcome in the hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection
    Kim, Do Hyoung
    Park, Hayne Cho
    Cho, Ajin
    Kim, Juhee
    Yun, Kyu-sang
    Kim, Jinseog
    Lee, Young-Ki
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (18) : E25900
  • [48] Does Charlson Comorbidity Score Dilute the Survival Impact of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Women with Early Stage Endometrial Cancer? A Matched Analysis
    Bergman, D. M.
    Chaugle, S.
    Burmeister, C.
    Hanna, R. K.
    Elshaikh, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E643 - E644
  • [49] Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index predicts survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients after curative resection
    Qu, Wei-Feng
    Zhou, Pei-Yun
    Liu, Wei-Ren
    Tian, Meng-Xin
    Jin, Lei
    Jiang, Xi-Fei
    Wan, Han
    Tao, Chen-Yang
    Fang, Yuan
    Zhou, Yu-Fu
    Song, Shu-Shu
    Ding, Zhen-Bin
    Peng, Yuan-Fei
    Dai, Zhi
    Qiu, Shuang-Jian
    Zhou, Jian
    Fan, Jia
    Tang, Zheng
    Shi, Ying-Hong
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (07)
  • [50] Prognostic value and association of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index with sarcopenia within patients with gastric cancer after radical resection
    Shao, Jiancan
    Gao, Zekan
    Shen, Qingzheng
    Zhi, Huaiqing
    Wang, Xiang
    Zheng, Jingwei
    Chen, Yajin
    Shi, Ang
    Wu, Dongze
    Cai, Wanda
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Shen, Xian
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 28 (07) : 1089 - 1094