An international, cross-sectional survey of the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties

被引:16
|
作者
Bates, Brent D. [1 ]
Walmsley, David W. [2 ]
Vicente, Milena R. [2 ]
Kuzyk, Paul R. [3 ]
Nauth, Aaron [1 ,2 ]
Waddell, James P. [2 ]
McKee, Michael D. [2 ]
Schemitsch, Emil H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Keenan Res Ctr Biomed Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Total hip arthroplasty; Periprosthetic fracture; Vancouver type B1; Locking plate; Strut allograft; Survey; WELL-FIXED IMPLANTS; SHAFT FRACTURES; PLATE FIXATION; ONLAY ALLOGRAFTS; FEMUR FRACTURES; STRUT ALLOGRAFT; REDUCTION; ALGORITHM; STEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.034
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: The incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties is increasing. Fractures around a stable implant stem (Vancouver type B1) are among the most common of these fractures. Various fixation strategies for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures have been reported in the literature; however, little high-level evidence exists. This study was designed to determine the current management strategies and opinions among orthopaedic surgeons treating Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures, and to evaluate the need for a large prospective randomized controlled trial for the management of these injuries. Methods: Orthopaedic surgeon members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), and the Hip Society were invited to participate in a 51-item web-based survey surrounding the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip replacements, as well as the perceived need for future research in this area. Responses were summarized using proportions, and further stratified by practice type, case volume, surgeon age, and fellowship training. Results: For Vancouver type B1 fractures, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locked plating was favoured slightly over ORIF with cable plating +/- cortical strut allograft (51.1% versus 45.5%). When compared to cable plating with cortical strut allograft, respondents believed that isolated locked plating resulted in lower nonunion and reoperation rates, but similar infection and malunion rates. Subgroup analyses revealed that practice type, surgeon age, case volume, and fellowship training influenced surgeons' management of periprosthetic femoral fractures and beliefs regarding complications. There is high demand for a large prospective randomized controlled trial for Vancouver type B1 fracture fixation. Conclusions: Consensus surrounding the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures is lacking, and there is a perceived need among orthopaedic surgeons for a large prospective randomized controlled trial in order to define the optimal management of these injuries. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 369
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY VANCOUVER TYPE B
    Bulatovic, Nikola
    Kezunovic, Miroslav
    Vucetic, Cedomir
    Abdic, Nermin
    Bencic, Ivan
    Cengic, Tomislav
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2017, 56 (03) : 536 - 543
  • [2] Osteosynthesis in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures
    Roche-Albero, Adrian
    Mateo-Agudo, Jesus
    Martin-Hernandez, Carlos
    Arnaudas-Casanueva, Maria
    Gil-Albarova, Jorge
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2021, 52 (08): : 2451 - 2458
  • [3] Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Bryant, Ginger K.
    Morshed, Saam
    Agel, Julie
    Henley, M. Bradford
    Barei, David P.
    Taitsman, Lisa A.
    Nork, Sean E.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (11): : 1180 - 1186
  • [4] Outcomes of cable fixation after Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Yenigul, Ali Erkan
    Ermutlu, Cenk
    Onder, Cem
    Atici, Teoman
    Durak, Kemal
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2023, 29 (11): : 1314 - 1319
  • [5] Proximal femoral allograft treatment of vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty
    Maury, AC
    Pressman, A
    Cayen, B
    Zalzal, P
    Backstein, D
    Gross, A
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (05): : 953 - 958
  • [6] The impact of stem fixation method on Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture management
    Wang, Katherine
    Kenanidis, Eustathios
    Gamie, Zakareya
    Suleman, Khurram
    Miodownik, Mark
    Avadi, Mahsa
    Horne, David
    Thompson, Jonathan
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    Moazen, Mehran
    SICOT-J, 2022, 8
  • [7] Reversed Contralateral LISS Plate for Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures
    Russo, Matthew
    Malekzadeh, A. Stephen
    Hampton, Chadwick
    Hymes, Robert
    Schwartzbach, Cary
    Schulman, Jeffrey
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (06) : E467 - E472
  • [8] The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise
    Yasen, Adam T.
    Haddad, Fares S.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (09) : 1873 - 1879
  • [9] The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise
    Adam T. Yasen
    Fares S. Haddad
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1873 - 1879
  • [10] The Effect of Strut Allograft and Its Position on Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Biomechanical Study
    Sariyilmaz, Kerim
    Dikici, Fatih
    Dikmen, Goksel
    Bozdag, Ergun
    Sunbuloglu, Emin
    Bekler, Bugra
    Yazicioglu, Onder
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (07): : 1485 - 1490