Anger, Provocation and Loss of Self-Control: What Does "Losing It' Really Mean?
被引:5
|
作者:
Sorial, Sarah
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Wollongong, Fac Law Humanities & Arts Philosophy, Wollongong, NSW, AustraliaUniv Wollongong, Fac Law Humanities & Arts Philosophy, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Sorial, Sarah
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Law Humanities & Arts Philosophy, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Criminal defences;
Provocation;
Loss of self-control;
Emotions;
REFORM;
D O I:
10.1007/s11572-018-9467-8
中图分类号:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
Drawing on recent research in the philosophy of the emotions and empirical evidence from social psychology, this paper argues that the concept of loss of self-control at common law mischaracterises the relationship between the emotions and their effects on action. Emotions do not undermine reason in the ways offenders describe (and courts sometimes accept); nor do they compel people to act in ways they cannot control. As such, the idea of loss of self-control' is an inaccurate and misleading description of the psychological mechanisms at play in cases of emotionally motivated killing, where there may not be any loss of self-control' as such.